SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A ===============================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [_]
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]
¨
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12
¨ PreliminaryProxy Statement | ¨ Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
x Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
| ¨ Definitive Additional Materials | ||
| ¨ Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
Marriott International, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name
(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)
Marriott International, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other thanOther Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]
x No fee required.
[_]
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_]
| 1. | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| 2. | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| 3. | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| 4. | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| 5. | Total fee paid: |
¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
Reg. (S) 240.14a-101.
SEC 1913 (3-99)
Corporate Headquarters: Mailing Address:
10400 Fernwood Road Marriott Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20817 Washington, D.C. 20058
[LOGO] materials:
| ¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| 1. | Amount previously paid: |
| 2. | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| 3. | Filing Party: |
| 4. | Date Filed: |
| Corporate Headquarters: | Mailing Address: | |||
| 10400 Fernwood Road | Marriott Drive | |||
| Bethesda, Maryland 20817 | Washington, D.C. 20058 |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD FRIDAY, MAY 3, 2002
-----------------
6, 2005
To our Shareholders:
March 28, 2002
31, 2005
The 20022005 annual meeting of shareholders of Marriott International, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) will be held at the J.W.JW Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. on Friday, May 3, 2002,6, 2005, beginning at 10:30 a.m. Doors to the meeting will open at 9:30 a.m. At the meeting, shareholders will act on the following matters:
(1) Election of four directors, each for a term of three years;
(2) Ratification of the restatement of the Marriott International, Inc.
1998 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan including an increase
of 9 million shares of the Company's Class A common stock authorized
for issuance;
(3) Consideration of 6 shareholder proposals; and
(4) Any other matters that properly come before the meeting.
| (1) | Election of four directors, each for a term of three years; |
| (2) | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2005; |
| (3) | Approval of an increase of 5 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock authorized for issuance under the Marriott International, Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan; |
| (4) | Consideration of 2 shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting; and |
| (5) | Any other matters that properly come before the meeting. |
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 12, 200215, 2005 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at this meeting.
For the convenience of our shareholders, proxies may be given either by telephone, electronically through the Internet, or by completing, signing, and returning the enclosed proxy card. In addition, shareholders may elect to receive future shareholder communications, including proxy materials, through the Internet. Instructions for each of these options can be found in the enclosed materials.
By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ DOROTHY M. INGALLS
Dorothy M. Ingalls
Secretary
By order of the Board of Directors, |
 |
Dorothy M. Ingalls |
Secretary |
PLEASE REFER TO THE OUTSIDE BACK COVER FOR DIRECTIONS TO THE MEETING
AND INFORMATION ON PARKING, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LODGING.
i
| 33 | ||
| Item | 34 | |
| 36 | ||
| 37 | ||
| A-1 | ||
| B-1 | ||
| C-1 | ||
ii
[LOGO] Marriott
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
10400 FERNWOOD ROAD, BETHESDA, MARYLAND 20817
-----------------
PROXY STATEMENT
-----------------
This proxy statement contains information related to the annual meeting of shareholders of Marriott International, Inc. ("(“we" "us,",” “us,” or the "Company"“Company”) to be held on Friday, May 3, 2002,6, 2005, beginning at 10:30 a.m., at the J.W.JW Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at any postponements or adjournments thereof.of the meeting. This proxy statement is first being mailed to shareholders by the Company on March 28, 2002.
We became a public company in March 1998, when we were "spun off" as a
separate entity by the company formerly named "Marriott International, Inc."
(the "Spin-Off"). Our company, the "new" Marriott International, was formed to
conduct the lodging, senior living and distribution services businesses
formerly conducted by "old" Marriott International. "Old" Marriott
International ("Old Marriott"), now called Sodexho, Inc., is a provider of food
service and facilities management in North America.
31, 2005.
What is the purpose of the annual meeting?
At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters described in the accompanying notice of meeting. This includesThese actions include the election of four directors, ratification of the Company's amendment and restatementappointment of our 1998the independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditor”), approval of an increase of 5 million shares of Class A common stock authorized for issuance under the 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2002 Incentive Plan”), and if properly presented at the meeting, consideration of 6two shareholder proposals. In addition, our management will report on the Company’s performance of the
Company during fiscal 20012004 and respond to questions from shareholders.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date, March 12, 2002,15, 2005, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. Each outstanding share of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock entitles its holder to cast ten votes on each matter to be voted upon. Each outstanding share of the Company ESOP
Convertible Preferred Stock votes together with the Company's Class A common
stock on all matters and entitles State Street Bank & Trust Company, as the
Investment Manager of the Marriott Employees' Profit Sharing, Retirement and
Savings Plan and Trust (the "401(k) Plan"), to cast one vote on each matter to
be voted upon. State Street is to exercise these voting rights in its sole
discretion as fiduciary with respect to the 401(k) Plan.
All shareholders as of record at the close of business on the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.
Directions
You will find directions to the meeting, and information on parking, public transportation and lodging, can be found on the back cover of this proxy statement.
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A common stock of the Company outstanding on the record date and entitled to vote will
constitute a quorum. A quorum is required for business to be conducted at the meeting. As of the record date, 242,573,589224,654,507 shares of Class A common stock of the Company were entitled to voteoutstanding and 7,396 shares of the ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock were entitled to vote. If you submit a properly executed proxy card, even if you abstain from voting, then you will be considered part of the quorum. However, abstentions are not
counted in the tally of votes FOR or AGAINST a proposal. A WITHHELD vote is
treated the same as an abstention.
You may vote by either casting your vote in person at the meeting, or by marking, signing and datedating each proxy card you receive and returnreturning it in the prepaid envelope. Your shares will be voted as you indicatedindicate on the proxy card. If you return your signed proxy card but do not mark the boxes indicating how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted FOR items 1, 2, and 23 and AGAINST items 3, 4 5, 6, 7 and 8.
5.
What does the Board recommend?
The Board’s recommendations are set forth after the description of each item in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote:
| · | FOR election of the nominated directors (see Item 1 on page 8); |
| · | FOR ratification of the appointment of the independent auditor (see Item 2 on page 32); |
| · | FOR approval of an increase of 5 million shares of Class A common stock authorized for issuance under the 2002 Incentive Plan (see Item 3 on page 32); |
| · | AGAINST the shareholder proposal to declassify the Board of Directors and establish annual election of all directors (see Item 4 on page 33); and |
| · | AGAINST the shareholder proposal to require election of directors by a majority of votes cast at an annual meeting (see Item 5 on page 34). |
Unless you give other instructions, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.
Can I vote by telephone or electronically?
You may vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet by following the instructions attached to your proxy card.
The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by use of a personal identification number. The procedures, which are designed to comply with Delaware law, allow shareholders to appoint a proxy to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
If you hold your shares in “street name,” you may be able to vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet in accordance with the voting instructions provided by your broker or other nominee.
Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card, or after I vote by telephone or electronically?
Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised at the meeting. Regardless of the way in which you submitted your original proxy, you may change it by:
(1) Returning a later-dated signed proxy card;
(2) Delivering a written notice of revocation to EquiServe Trust Company,
N.A., P.O. Box 8089, Edison, New Jersey 08818-9355;
(3) Voting by telephone or the Internet; or
(4) Voting in person at the meeting.
| (1) | Returning a later-dated signed proxy card; |
| (2) | Delivering a written notice of revocation to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 8089, Edison, New Jersey 08818-9355; |
| (3) | Voting by telephone or the Internet; or |
| (4) | Voting in person at the meeting. |
If your shares are held through a broker or other nominee, you will need to contact that institution if you wish to change your voting instructions.
2
What are
How do I vote my 401(k) shares?
If you participate in the Board's recommendations?
The Board's recommendations are set forth afterMarriott Employees’ Profit Sharing, Retirement and Savings Plan and Trust (the “401(k) Plan”) or the descriptionSodexho Employee Savings Plan, you may give voting instructions as to the number of each
item inshare equivalents allocated to your account as of the record date. You may provide voting instructions to the trustee under the applicable plan by completing and returning the proxy card accompanying this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote:
. FOR election of the nominated directors (see Item 1 on page 9);
. FOR ratification of the restatement of the Marriott International, Inc.
1998 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, including an increase
of 9 million shares of the Company's Class A common stock authorized for
issuance (see Item 2 on page 28);
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal regarding cumulative voting (see Item 3
on page 34).
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal to set a goal of establishing a Board of
Directors with at least two-thirds of its members being "independent
directors" as defined in the shareholder proposal (see Item 4 on page 35).
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal to establish a policy providing for a
transition to a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee composed
entirely of "independent directors" as defined in the shareholder
proposal (see Item 5 on page 36).
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal to create a committee of independent
directors to prepare a report describing risks to shareholders of
operating and/or franchising hotels in Myanmar (see Item 6 on page 37).
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal to adopt, implement and enforce a
workforce code of conduct based on the International Labor Organization's
Conventions on workplace human rights (see Item 7 on page 39).
. AGAINST the shareholder proposal to adopt a policy that in the future
independent accountants will provide only audit services to the Company
and no other services (see Item 8 on page 41).
Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as
proxy holders on the proxy cardThe trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your duly executed instructions if they are received by 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time, May 4, 2005. If you do not send instructions, the recommendationstrustee will vote the number of shares equal to the Board of Directors.
share equivalents credited to your account in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.
What vote is required to approve each item?
In the election of directors, the four nominees who receive the highest number of "FOR"“FOR” votes will be elected. A "WITHHELD"“WITHHELD” vote does not affect the election of directors. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast on the matter is required to approve the amendment to the 2002 Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance, provided that stockholders holding a majority of the shares outstanding on the record date actually cast votes on this matter. For each other item, when a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item will be required for approval. A
properly executed proxy marked "ABSTAIN"Instructions to “ABSTAIN” with respect to any item will not be voted on that item, although itthey will be counted for purposes of determining the number of shares represented and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a negative vote.
vote “AGAINST.”
If you hold your shares in "street name"“street name” through a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with
respect toon some of the items to be acted upon. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted on those items and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval for each item. Shares represented by such "broker non-votes"“broker non-votes” will, however, be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.
3
Representatives of EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., our independent stock transfer agent, will count the votes and act as the inspector of election.
What shares are included on my proxy card(s)?
The shares on your proxy card(s) represent ALL of your shares of Class A common stock that the Company'sCompany’s stock transfer records indicate that you hold, including (i) any shares you may hold through
the DirectSERVICE Investment Program administered by EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., and,; (ii) if you are a Marriott employee, any shares that may be held for your account by Bankers Trust CompanyT. Rowe Price as custodian for the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) if you are a Sodexho Inc. employee, any shares that may be held for your account by State Street Bank and Trust Company as trustee for the Sodexho Employee Savings Plan. If you have shares in the 401(k) Plan or the Sodexho Employee Savings Plan and do not vote by proxy, or return your proxy card with an unclear voting designation or no voting designation at all, then Bankers Trustthe 401(k) Plan trustee or State Street, as applicable, will vote your 401(k) Plan shares in proportion to the way the other 401(k) Plan participants or Sodexho Employee Savings Plan participants, as applicable, voted their shares in the 401(k) Plan. If you hold shares through a broker or other
nominee, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for those shares.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
If your shares are registered under different names or are in more than one account, you will receive more than one proxy card. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return all proxy cards, or if you choose, vote by telephone or through the Internet using the personal identification number printed on each proxy card. We encourage you to have all accounts registered in the same name and address (whenever possible). You can accomplish this by contacting our transfer agent, EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., at (800) 311-4816.
How will voting on any other business be conducted?
Although we currently do not know of any business to be considered at the 20022005 annual meeting other than the proposals described in this proxy statement, if any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives authority to J.W. Marriott, Jr. and Richard E. MarriottWilliam J. Shaw to vote on such matters at their discretion.
When are shareholder proposals for the 20032006 annual meeting of shareholders due?
Our 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is scheduled for May 2, 2003.
To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for thatthe 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholder proposals must be received at our offices no later than November 28, 2002.December 1, 2005. Proposals must be in compliancecomply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and our bylaws, and must be submitted in writing delivered or
mailed to the Corporate Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, Marriott Drive, Washington, D.C. 20058.
In addition, our bylaws require that, if a shareholder desires to introduce a shareholder proposal or nominate a director candidate from the floor of the 20032006 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholder must submit such proposal or nomination must be
submitted in writing to the Company'sCompany’s Secretary at the above address not later than February 2, 2003.5, 2006. The written proposal or nomination must be in compliancecomply with our bylaws. The Chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any shareholder proposal or the nomination of any person made later
thanafter February 2, 2003,5, 2006, or that does not in compliancecomply with our bylaws. CanIf a shareholder nominate someonefails to bemeet these deadlines or satisfy the requirements of Rule 14a-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the proxies we solicit allow us to vote on such proposals as we deem appropriate. You may obtain a directorcopy of the Company?
Asour bylaws by submitting a shareholder, you may recommend any person for consideration as a
nominee for director by writingrequest to the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee of the Board of Directors, c/oSecretary, Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, Marriott Drive, Washington, D.C. 20058. Recommendations must be
4
received by February 2, 2003 for the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders, and
must comply with the requirements in our bylaws.
How much did this proxy solicitation cost and who paid that cost?
The Company paid for this proxy solicitation. We hired MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the distribution of proxy materials and solicitation of votes for $7,500,foran estimated fee of $15,000, plus
reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. We also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to shareholders. Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, or other means of communication. Our directors, officers and regular employees who are not specifically employed for proxy solicitation purposes and who will not receive any additional compensation for such activities may also solicit proxies.
Can I receive future shareholder communications electronically through the Internet?
Yes. You may elect to receive future notices of meetings, proxy materials and annual reports electronically through the Internet. If you have previously consented to electronic delivery, your consent will remain in effect until withdrawn. To consent to electronic delivery:
. If your shares are registered in your own name, and not in "street name"
through a broker or other nominee, fill out the consent form at the
Internet site maintained by our transfer agent, EquiServe Trust Company,
N.A., at www.econsent.com/mar.
. If your shares are registered in "street name" through a broker or other
nominee, you must first vote your shares using the Internet, at
www.proxyvote.com, and immediately after voting, fill out the consent
form that appears on-screen at the end of the Internet voting procedure.
| · | If your shares are registered in your own name, and not in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, fill out the consent form at the Internet site maintained by our transfer agent, EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., atwww.econsent.com/mar. |
| · | If your shares are registered in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, you must first vote your shares using the Internet, atwww.proxyvote.com, and immediately after voting, fill out the consent form that appears on-screen at the end of the Internet voting procedure. |
You may withdraw this consent at any time and resume receiving shareholder communications in print form. More information on electronic delivery of
materials is set forth in an insert accompanying this proxy statement.
5
Stock Ownership of our Directors, and Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Class A common stock by our directors and executive officers as of January 31, 2002,2005, as well as additional information about beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock. Ownership consists of sole voting and sole investment power, except as indicated in the notes below, and except for shares registered in the name of children sharing the same household or subject to any community property laws.
Name | Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class(1) | |||
Directors: | |||||
J.W. Marriott, Jr. | 31,202,963 | (2)(3) | 13.6 | ||
Richard S. Braddock | 4,000 | * | |||
Lawrence W. Kellner | 1,000 | (4) | * | ||
Debra L. Lee | 0 | (5) | * | ||
John W. Marriott III | 6,972,459 | (6)(7)(8) | 3.0 | ||
Floretta Dukes McKenzie | 1,308 | (4)(7) | * | ||
George Muñoz | 5,004 | (4) | * | ||
Harry J. Pearce | 4,175 | (4) | * | ||
Roger W. Sant | 31,565 | (4)(7) | * | ||
William J. Shaw | 1,626,528 | (6)(7) | * | ||
Lawrence M. Small | 84,466 | (4)(7)(9) | * | ||
Other Named Executive Officers: | |||||
Joseph Ryan | 678,244 | (7) | * | ||
Arne M. Sorenson | 556,561 | (6)(7) | * | ||
James M. Sullivan | 870,462 | (6)(7) | * | ||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group: | |||||
(20 persons including the foregoing) | 36,555,290 | (10) | 15.6 | ||
Other 5% Beneficial Owners: | |||||
Richard E. Marriott | 25,226,097 | (2)(11) | 11.2 | ||
| * | Less than 1 percent. |
| (1) | Based on the number of |
| (2) | Includes: (i) 3,067,809 shares held by J.W. Marriott, |
| (3) | Includes, in addition to the shares referred to in footnote (2): (i) 3,699,443 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after January 31, 2005; (ii) 139,735 shares owned by J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s wife (Mr. Marriott disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares); (iii) 1,340,534 shares owned by four trusts for the benefit of J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s children, in which his wife |
serves as a co-trustee; (iv) 48,728 shares owned by six trusts for the benefit of J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s grandchildren, in which his wife serves as a co-trustee; (v) 160,000 shares owned by JWM Associates Limited Partnership, whose general partner is J.W. Marriott, Jr.; (vi) 5,413,980 shares owned by JWM Family Enterprises, L.P., whose general partner is a corporation in which J.W. Marriott, Jr. is a controlling shareholder; (vii) 6,600,000 shares owned by JWM Argent Family Limited Partnership, whose general partner is J.W. Marriott, Jr.; and (viii) 29,327 shares owned by the J. Willard Marriott, Jr. Foundation, in which J.W. Marriott, Jr. and his wife serve as trustees. J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s address is Marriott International, Inc., 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. |
| (4) | Does not include non-employee director annual deferred share awards or stock units representing fees that non-employee directors have elected to defer under our 2002 Incentive Plan. The combined number of shares (i) subject to deferred share awards and (ii) in stock unit accounts of non-employee directors as of January 31, 2005, were as follows: Mr. Kellner: 2,459; Dr. McKenzie: 17,091; Mr. Muñoz: 3,029; Mr. Pearce: 21,936; Mr. Sant: 19,062; and Mr. Small: 18,224. Share awards and stock units do not carry voting rights and are not transferable. Dividend equivalents are credited to stock unit accounts in the form of additional stock units. Share awards and stock units are distributed following retirement as a director. |
| (5) | Ms. Lee acquired 319 shares on February 24, 2005. |
| (6) | Includes shares of unvested restricted stock awarded under the 2002 Incentive Plan as follows: John W. |
| (7) | Includes shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after January 31, 2005, as follows: John W. |
| (8) | Includes (i) 5,413,980 shares owned by JWM Family Enterprises, L.P. whose general partner is a corporation in which John W. Marriott III is the president; (ii) 160,000 shares owned by JWM Associates Limited Partnership, whose limited partner is John W. Marriott III; (iii) 393,480 shares held as beneficiary of two trusts, in which Richard E. Marriott and J.W. Marriott, Jr. serve as co-trustees; (iv) 337,360 shares held as beneficiary of a trust in which J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s wife serves as co-trustee; and (v) 24,522 shares owned by three trusts, for the benefit of John W. Marriott III’s children, in which his spouse and J.W. Marriott, Jr.’s wife are co-trustees. J.W. Marriott, Jr. and John W. Marriott III report these shares as beneficially owned but these shares are included only once in reporting the number of shares owned by all directors and executive officers as a group. Includes, in addition to the shares referred to above (i) 15,605 shares owned by John W. Marriott III’s wife (Mr. Marriott disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares); and (ii) 62,079 shares held as trustee of three trusts for the benefit of John W. Marriott III’s children. |
| (9) | Includes 5,400 shares held by Lawrence M. |
| (10) | All |
| (11) | Includes, in addition to the |
controlling shareholder; and (v) 36,327 shares owned by the Richard E. and Nancy P. Marriott Foundation in which Richard E. Marriott and his wife serve as directors and officers. Richard E. Marriott is the brother of J.W. Marriott, Jr. and is a former director and officer of the Company. Richard E. Marriott’s address is Host Marriott Corporation, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC and the NYSE reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 concerning their ownership of and transactions in the common stock and other equity securities of the Company, generally within two business days of a reportable transaction. As a practical matter, the Company seeks to assist its directors and executives by monitoring transactions and completing and filing reports on their behalf.
Based upon a review of filings with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that all of our directors, all of our officers and all of our officers10% beneficial owners who are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 complied with such reporting requirements during fiscal 2001 other than one
transaction reported on an untimely basis by each of Gilbert M. Grosvenor,
William T. Petty and James M. Sullivan.
8
ITEM 1--ELECTION1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with approximately one-third of the directors standing for election each year for a three-year term. Sterling D. Colton holds the title of director emeritus.
Directors Standing for Election
Four directors are standing for election: Debra L. Lee, J.W. Marriott, Jr., Ann M. Fudge,
W. Mitt RomneyGeorge Muñoz, and William J. Shaw. Each of these nominees currently serves on the Board and has consented to serve for an additional term ending at the 20052008 annual meeting of shareholders.
Ifshareholders, or when their successor is duly elected and qualified. Debra L. Lee and George Muñoz, who were appointed to the Board, were initially recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by J.W. Marriott, Jr., our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
We do not know of any reason why any of the nominees would be unable to serve. However, if any of the nominees should become unavailable to serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board.
Richard E. Marriott has announced his intention to resign as director in
May 2002. Mr. Marriott has served as a director of the Company or its
predecessors since 1979. The Board wishes to thank Mr. Marriott for his
dedicated and loyal service to the Company.
Henry Cheng Kar-Shun resigned as director effective January 4, 2002. Dr.
Cheng served as a director of the Company or its predecessor since 1997. The
Board wishes to thank Dr. Cheng for his service to the Company.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the nominees.
The following are the nominees for director for three-year terms ending in 2005:
2008:
J.W. Marriott, Jr. (Chairman of the Board) Age: 73
| Mr. Marriott is Chairman of the Board of Directors and our Chief Executive |
Debra L. Lee Age: 50
| Ms. Lee is President and Chief Operating Officer of Black Entertainment Television (BET), a media and entertainment company owned by Viacom. Ms. Lee’s career at BET began in 1986 as Vice President and General Counsel. In 1992, she was named Executive Vice President of Legal Affairs and Publisher of BET’s magazine division, while continuing to serve as General Counsel. In 1995, Ms. Lee assumed responsibility for BET’s strategic business development and was named President and Chief Operating Officer in 1996. Prior to joining BET, Ms. Lee was an attorney with Washington, D.C.-based law firm Steptoe & Johnson. Ms. Lee serves on the Board of Directors of the following publicly traded companies: Eastman Kodak Company and Washington Gas & Light Company. She is also a director of the following professional and civic organizations: the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Center for Communication, Girls, Inc., the Kennedy Center’s Community & Friends, National Symphony Orchestra, National Women’s Law Center, and the Alvin Ailey Dance Theater. She is a Trustee Emeritus at Brown University. She has served as a director of the Company since 2004. | |
George Muñoz Age: 53
| Mr. Muñoz is a principal in the Washington, D.C.-based firm Muñoz Investment Banking Group, LLC. He is also a partner in the Chicago-based law firm Tobin, Petkus & Muñoz. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Overseas Private Investment Corporation from 1997 to January 2001. Mr. Muñoz was Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department from 1993 until 1997. Mr. Muñoz is a certified public accountant and an attorney. He is a director of the following publicly traded companies: Altria Group, Inc., Anixter International, Inc. and Archipelago Holdings, Inc. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of the National Geographic Society. He has served as a director of the Company since 2002. | |
William J. Shaw Age: 59
| Mr. Shaw has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of |
Directors Continuing in Office
Richard Age: 63
| Mr. | |
Lawrence W. Kellner Age: 46
| Mr. Kellner is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of | |
John W. Marriott III Age: 43
| Mr. Marriott joined Marriott Corporation in 1976 and became Executive Vice President—Lodging for the Company in January 2003. He is responsible for leading Global Sales and Marketing, Brand Management, Operations Planning and Support and North American Lodging Operations. Prior to his current position, Mr. Marriott served as Executive Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. He previously held the position of Senior Vice President for Marriott’s Mid-Atlantic Region. In April 2002, Mr. Marriott was named by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Japanese government to co-chair a special taskforce to promote travel between the United States and Japan. John W. Marriott III is the son of J.W. Marriott, Jr. He has served as a director of the Company since 2002. He is currently serving a three-year term expiring at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
Floretta Dukes McKenzie Age: 69
| Dr. McKenzie is Senior Advisor to the |
Harry J. Pearce Age: 62
| Mr. Pearce was | |
Roger W. Sant Age: 73
| Mr. Sant is Chairman | |
Lawrence M. Small Age: 63
| Mr. Small is the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the |
The Board of Directors met sevenfour times in 2001.2004. The Company encourages all directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. All directors serving at the time attended the Company’s annual shareholders meeting in 2004. (Ms. Lee and Mr. Braddock joined the Board after the annual meeting.) No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Committees on which such director served.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has fourfive standing committees: Audit; Compensation Policy; Nominating and Corporate Governance; Committee for Excellence; and Executive.
Audit Committee
. The members of the Committee are not Company employees and are
independent as defined under New York Stock Exchange Rules. The Audit
Committee met three times in 2001.
. The Audit Committee has unrestricted access to both our independent
auditors and internal auditors.
. The Audit Committee has considered whether the independent auditor's
provision of information technology services and other non-audit services
to the Company is compatible with auditor independence.
. The full text of the Audit Committee Charter is set forth in Appendix A
to this proxy statement.
Functions include:
. Meeting with our independent auditors, management representatives and
internal auditors.
. Reviewing the results of internal and external audits, the accounting
principles applied in financial reporting and the financial and
operational controls.
. Approving the scope of audits to be performed by the independent and
internal auditors.
. Recommending to the Board the appointment of independent auditors
considering whether any circumstance, including the performance of any
professional services, would impair their independence.
Members: Lawrence M. Small (Chair), Gilbert M. Grosvenor, W. Mitt Romney,
and Roger W. Sant. Ann M. Fudge became a member of the Committee in
February 2002.
Compensation Policy Committee
. The members of the Committee are not Company employees. The Compensation
Policy Committee met four times in 2001.
Functions include:
. Recommending to the Board policies and procedures relating to senior
officers' compensation and various employee benefit plans.
. Approving senior officer salary adjustments, bonus payments and stock
awards.
Members: Floretta Dukes McKenzie (Chair), Harry J. Pearce, Roger W. Sant, W.
Mitt Romney, and Lawrence M. Small.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
.
Members: | Lawrence M. Small (Chair), Lawrence W. Kellner, George Muñoz, and Roger W. Sant. |
| · | The members of the Committee are not Company employees. The Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Committee are independent as defined under the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listing Standards, applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the Company’s Governance Principles adopted by the Board (“Governance Principles”). The Audit Committee Charter is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Committee met four times in person and two times telephonically in 2004. |
| · | There is unrestricted access between the Audit Committee and the independent auditors and internal auditors. |
| · | The Board of Directors has determined the following Audit Committee members are financial experts as defined in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules: |
| · | Lawrence M. Small |
| · | Lawrence W. Kellner |
| · | George Muñoz |
| · | Roger W. Sant |
| · | The full text of the Audit Committee Charter is set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
Functions include:
| · | Appointing, overseeing and determining the compensation and services of the Company’s independent auditors. |
| · | Pre-approving all audit fees, the terms of all audit services, and any permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s independent auditors. |
| · | Considering whether any circumstance, including the performance of any permissible non-audit services, would impair the independence of the Company’s principal independent auditor. |
| · | Overseeing the accounting, reporting and financial practices of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the integrity of the Company’s financial statements. |
| · | Overseeing the Company’s internal control environment and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
| · | Overseeing the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. |
Compensation Policy Committee
| Members: | Roger W. Sant (Chair), Richard S. Braddock, Floretta Dukes McKenzie and Lawrence M. Small. |
| · | The members of the Committee are not Company employees. The Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Committee are independent as defined under the NYSE Listing Standards and our Governance Principles. The Compensation Policy Committee Charter is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Compensation Policy Committee met four times in 2004. |
Functions include:
| · | Recommending to the Board policies and procedures relating to senior officers’ compensation and various employee benefit plans. |
| · | Approving senior officer salary adjustments, bonus payments and stock awards. |
| · | Approving and recommending to the Board the specific amounts of non-employee Directors’ compensation. |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
| Members: | Lawrence W. Kellner (Chair), Debra L. Lee, Floretta Dukes McKenzie and George Muñoz. |
| · | The members of the Committee are not Company employees. The Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Committee are independent as defined under the NYSE Listing Standards and our Governance Principles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2004. |
Functions include:
| · | Making recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance matters and updates to the Governance Principles. |
| · | Reviewing qualifications of candidates for Board membership. |
| · | Advising the Board on a range of matters affecting the Board and its committees, including making recommendations with respect to qualifications of director candidates, selection of committee chairs, committee assignments and related matters affecting the functioning of the Board. |
Committee for Excellence
| Members: | Board of Director members George Muñoz (Chair), Debra L. Lee, Harry J. Pearce, and William J. Shaw. Company officers Stephen A. Bauman, Vice President—Workforce Development; Rita M. Cuddihy, Senior Vice President—Marketing; Carolyn B. Handlon, Executive Vice President—Finance and Global Treasurer; Norman K. Jenkins, Senior Vice President—North American Lodging Development; David A. Rodriguez, Executive Vice President—Lodging Human Resources; David M. Sampson, Senior Vice President—Diversity Initiatives; and Charlotte B. Sterling, Executive Vice President—Communications. |
| · | The members of the Committee consist of at least three or more members of the Board of Directors, at least two of whom are not officers or employees. The Committee may also consist of officers and employees of the Company who are not Directors. Some of these officers and employees will be appointed on an annually rotating basis. At least one member of the Committee is independent as defined under the NYSE Listing Standards and our Governance Principles. The Committee’s charter provides that an independent director will always be the Chairman of the Committee. The Committee for Excellence Charter is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Committee for Excellence met four times in 2004. |
Functions include:
| · | Identifying and encouraging efforts undertaken by the Company to promote and leverage the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women and minorities as employees of the Company. |
| · | Identifying and evaluating efforts undertaken by the Company to promote and leverage an increasingly diverse ownership, franchisee, customer, and vendor base. |
| · | Enhancing the public perception of efforts and successes to promote diversity and value people of different backgrounds, experiences, and cultures to benefit the Company’s strategic competitive advantage. |
| · | Reviewing and approving the goals and progress of the Project Excel team, which functions as the working group for the Committee. |
Executive Committee
| Members: | J. W. Marriott, Jr. (Chair) and Roger W. Sant. |
| · | The Executive Committee did not meet in 2004. |
Functions include:
| · | Exercises the powers of the Board when the Board is not in session, subject to specific restrictions as to powers retained by the full Board. Powers retained by the full Board include those relating to amendments to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws, mergers, consolidations, sales or exchanges involving substantially all of the Company’s assets, declarations of dividends and issuances of stock. |
Selection of Director Nominees
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met once in 2001.
13
Functions include:
. Making recommendationswill consider candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as by management and shareholders. As a shareholder, you may recommend any person for consideration as a nominee for director by writing to the Board regarding corporate governance
mattersNominating and considering nominees for election as directors.
. AdvisingCorporate Governance Committee of the Board onof Directors, c/o Marriott International, Inc., Marriott Drive, Department 52/862, Washington, D.C. 20058. Recommendations must include the name and address of the shareholder making the recommendation, a rangerepresentation that the shareholder is a holder of mattersrecord of Class A common stock, biographical information about the individual recommended and any other information the shareholder believes would be helpful to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating the individual recommended.
Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a candidate, the Committee evaluates the candidate against the qualifications set out in the Governance Principles, including:
| · | character, judgment, personal and professional ethics, integrity, values and familiarity with national and international issues affecting business; |
| · | depth of experience, skills and knowledge complementary to the Board and the Company’s business; |
| · | willingness to devote sufficient time to carry out the duties and responsibilities effectively. |
The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate. The Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to any persons it believes should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Committee. The procedures for considering candidates recommended by a shareholder for Board membership are consistent with the procedures for candidates recommended by members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other members of the Board or management.
The Governance Principles adopted by the Board meet or exceed the NYSE Listing Standards. The portion of the Governance Principles addressing director independence is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B, and the full text of the Governance Principles can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary.
Pursuant to the Governance Principles, the Board undertook its committees, including the making of recommendations with respect to
qualificationsannual review of director candidates, compensationindependence in February 2005. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of directors,
selectionhis or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. As provided in the Governance Principles, the purpose of committee chairs, committee assignmentsthis review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.
Based on the standards set forth in the Governance Principles and related matters
affectingafter reviewing any relationships involving Board members, the functioningBoard affirmatively determined that all of the Board.
Members: Gilbert M. Grosvenor (Chair)directors are independent of the Company and its management, with the exception of J.W. Marriott, Jr., Floretta Dukes McKenzieWilliam J. Shaw, and John W. Marriott III, each of whom is considered an inside director because of his employment as an executive of the Company, and Harry J. Pearce.Pearce, who is considered a non-independent outside director because Harry J. Pearce was Chairman of Hughes Electronics Corporation, an affiliate of General Motors Corporation, while J.W. Marriott, Jr. served on the Executive Compensation Committee
. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2001.
Function:
. Exercises the powers of the Board whenof Directors of General Motors Corporation until June 2002.
Meetings of Non-Employee Directors
Company policy requires non-employee directors to meet without management present at least twice a year. In 2004, the non-employee directors met without management present four times and the independent directors met without management present one time. The Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, currently Mr. Kellner, presides at the meetings of the non-employee directors without management present.
Shareholder Communications with the Board
Shareholders and others interested in communicating with the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the non-employee directors or the Audit Committee may do so by e-mail to business.ethics@marriott.com or in writing to the Business Ethics Department, One Marriott Drive, Department 52/924.09, Washington, D.C. 20058. All communications are forwarded to the
appropriate directors for their review, except that the Board ishas instructed the Company not in session,
subject to specific restrictions as to powers retained by the full Board.
Powers retained by the full Board include those relating to amendmentsforward solicitations, bulk mail or communications that do not address Company-related issues. The Company reports to the certificatedirectors on the status of incorporation and bylaws, mergers, consolidations,
sales or exchanges involving substantially all outstanding concerns addressed to the non-employee directors, the Chair of the Company's assets,
declarationsNominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. The non-employee directors, the Chair of dividendsthe Nominating and issuances of stock.
Members: J. W. Marriott, Jr. (Chair) and Roger W. Sant.
For information about our Long Range Planning Process,Corporate Governance Committee, or the Audit Committee may direct special procedures, including the Board's involvementretention of outside advisors or counsel, for any concern addressed to them.
The Board of Directors believes that stock ownership by non-employee directors is essential for aligning their interests with those of shareholders. To emphasize this principle, in such process, please visit
Marriott.com/investor/information.asp.
Directors'February 2003, the Compensation Policy Committee established stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s non-employee directors. The guidelines require directors to own Company stock or stock units valued at three times their annual cash and stock retainer. Directors have five years in which to meet this goal. All non-employee directors that have served as directors of the Company for five years or more have met this goal.
We compensate directors partially in cash and partially in Marriottthe Company’s common stock to align their interests with those of shareholders.stock. Our officers are not paid for their service as directors.
Annual Retainer and Attendance Fees.Fees. For 2001,2004, each non-employee director received a retainer fee of $37,500,$50,000, together with an attendance fee of $1,250 per Board, Committee or shareholder meeting.
Committee Chair Retainer. For 2004, the committee chair for the Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $10,000 and the Compensation Policy Committee Chair received an annual retainer of $5,000.
Annual Stock Awards.Awards. Each non-employee director also receives an annual director stock award under our 1998 Comprehensive Stock and Cash2002 Incentive Plan (the "1998 Plan").Plan. We award a number of shares having an aggregate market value as of the date of grant of approximately the amount of the annual directors'director’s retainer fee. We grant this award immediately prior to our annual meeting of shareholders. In 20012004 each award was for 8231,057 shares.
Deferral of Payment.Payment. Any director may elect to defer payment of all or any portion of his or her directors'director fees pursuant to our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and/or our 19982002 Incentive Plan. Gilbert M. Grosvenor, Floretta Dukes McKenzie, George Muñoz, Harry J. Pearce, W. Mitt Romney, Roger W. Sant, and Lawrence M. Small currently participate in one or both of these plans. Other.Amounts deferred to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan earn a market rate of return based on the available benchmark investment alternatives.
Other. We also reimburse directors for travel expenses, and other out-of-pocket costs they incur when attending meetings.
meetings and, for one meeting a year, attendance by spouses. To encourage our directors to visit and personally evaluate our properties, the directors also receive complimentary rooms, food and beverages at Company owned, operated or franchised hotels when on personal travel.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2001,
None of the members of the Compensation Policy Committee's members were Floretta
Dukes McKenzie (Chair), Harry J. Pearce, Roger W. Sant, W. Mitt Romney and
Lawrence M. Small.
14
J. W. Marriott, Jr. serves on the Executive Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of the BoardCompany.
Code of Directors of General Motors Corporation. Harry J. Pearce, a director
ofEthics and Business Conduct Guide
The Company has long maintained and enforced an Ethical Conduct Policy that applies toall Marriott associates, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The Ethical Conduct Policy, which has been in substantially its current form since the Company, was an executive officer of General Motors Corporation until
May 25, 2001mid-1980s, is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” Any future changes or amendments to our Ethical Conduct Policy, and a director of General Motors Corporation until June 5, 2001.
Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee recommended to the Board that Arthur Andersen LLP serve
as our independent auditors for 2002. Before making its recommendation to the
Board, the Audit Committee carefully considered Arthur Andersen's
qualifications as our independent auditors. The Board approved the appointment
on February 7, 2002. Although historically we have submitted the appointmentany waiver of our independent auditors for shareholder approval, givenEthical Conduct Policy that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, will be posted to our Investor Relations website. The Company also maintains a Business Conduct Guide which is available in our Investor Relations website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” A copy of both the uncertaintyEthical Conduct Policy and the pace of developments related to Arthur Andersen's recent challenges,Business Conduct Guide may also be obtained upon request from the Board does not believe it is appropriate to seek shareholder approval of the
appointment of Arthur Andersen at this time. The Audit Committee, however, will
continue to closely monitor Arthur Andersen's response to its challenges and
will consider the possibility that a change of independent auditors may be
appropriate.
Representatives of Arthur Andersen LLP are expected to be present at the
annual meeting and are expected to be available to respond to questions.
Company’s Corporate Secretary.
The Audit Committee reviews the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements, and the reporting process.process and maintaining an effective system of internal control over financial reporting. The Company'sCompany’s independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinionengaged to audit and express opinions on the conformity of our
auditedthe Company’s financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.
in the United States, management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements together with the results of management’s assessment of the internal control over financial reporting with management and the principal independent auditors the Company's audited financial
statements for the three fiscal years ended December 28, 2001.auditor. The Audit Committee has discussed with the principal independent auditorsauditor the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees)., as amended. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from the principal independent auditorsauditor the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and discussed with them their independence from the Company and its management. Finally, the Audit Committee has considered whether the principal independent auditorsauditor’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditors'auditor’s independence.
Relying on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the Company's audited financial statements for the three fiscal years
ended December 28, 2001 be included in the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2001,31, 2004, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
SEC.
Members of the Audit Committee
Lawrence M. Small, Ann M. Fudge
Gilbert M. GrosvenorChair
Lawrence W. Mitt Romney
Kellner
George Muñoz
Roger W. Sant
15
Pre-Approval of Independent AuditorsAuditor Fees and Services Policy
The Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor Fees and Services Policy provides for pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, tax and other permissible non-audit services provided by our principal independent auditor on an annual basis and individual engagements as needed. The policy also requires additional approval of any engagements that were previously approved but are anticipated to exceed pre-approved fee levels. The policy permits the Audit Committee Chair to pre-approve principal independent auditor services where the Company deems it necessary or advisable that such services commence prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting (provided that the Audit Committee Chair must report to the full Audit Committee on any pre-approval determinations).
Principal Independent Auditor Fee Disclosure
The following table presents Audit Fees, Financial Information Systems
Design and Implementation Fees, and All Other Fees (including Audit-Related and
Income-Tax Compliance fees) paid tofees for professional services rendered by our principal independent auditorsauditor for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal 2001.
2004 and fiscal 2003 and fees billed for audit-related services, tax services and all other services rendered by our principal independent auditor for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003.
| Principal Independent Auditor Fees Paid Related to Fiscal 2003 | Principal Independent Auditor Fees Paid Related to Fiscal 2004 | |||||
| Ernst & Young LLP | Ernst & Young LLP | |||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 3,709,906 | $ | 6,759,375 | ||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 875,866 | 1,709,828 | ||||
Tax Fees (primarily compliance work)(3) | 1,267,177 | 1,075,025 | ||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||
Total Fees | $ | 5,852,949 | $ | 9,544,228 | ||
| (1) | Principally fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, the auditors’ review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, and |
| (2) | Principally audits as required under our agreements with our hotel owners as well as audits of our employee benefits plans. |
| (3) | Principally tax compliance services related to our international entities. In addition, approximately $500,000 and $200,000 of individual tax compliance services procured on behalf of our internationally based expatriate associates for fiscal 2003 and 2004, respectively. |
Some of subsidiaries, benefit plan
audits, acquisition due diligence, accounting consultation, various attest
services under professional standards,the information below refers to stock issuances, stock option issuances and assistance with registration
statements, comfort lettersother actions taken by our two predecessor companies. In 1998 we were “spun off” as a separate entity (the “1998 Spin-Off”) by the company formerly named “Marriott International, Inc.” (“Old Marriott,” which is now called Sodexho Inc. and consents.
16
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
is a provider of food service and facilities management in North America). In 1993 Old Marriott was itself “spun off” as a separate entity (the “1993 Spin-Off”) by Marriott Corporation, which was renamed Host Marriott Corporation.
The following Summary Compensation Table shows the compensation we paid in 2001, 2000,2004, 2003, and 1999,2002 to our Chief Executive Officer and to our other four most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer)
as of December 28, 2001.
31, 2004.
| Annual Compensation | Long Term Compensation | |||||||||||||
Name and | Fiscal Year | Salary (1)($) | Bonus ($) | Other Compensation (2) | Restricted Stock Awards (3)(4)($) | Securities Underlying Stock Options (#) | All Other Compensation (5)(6)($) | |||||||
J.W. Marriott, Chairman and Chief | 2004 2003 2002 | 1,040,000 1,000,000 1,019,231 | 1,225,536 1,118,000 1,202,285 | 113,591 105,761 80,572 | 0 0 0 | 329,400 565,000 400,000 | 138,955 104,275 35,920 | |||||||
William J. President and Chief | 2004 2003 2002 | 832,000 800,000 789,904 | 862,784 787,200 818,977 | — — — | 0 1,963,650 0 | 148,240 250,000 175,000 | 338,034 313,987 8,500 | |||||||
James M. Executive Vice President | 2004 2003 2002 | 557,000 535,000 524,904 | 467,379 433,885 448,268 | — — — | 0 906,300 0 | 98,820 160,000 110,000 | 215,777 200,772 8,500 | |||||||
Arne M. Sorenson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2004 2003 2002 | 557,000 535,000 524,904 | 467,379 424,790 449,489 | — — — | 2,380,000 906,300 979,000 | 248,820 160,000 110,000 | 215,367 200,659 8,500 | |||||||
Joseph Ryan Executive Vice President | 2004 2003 2002 | 528,000 510,000 495,000 | 443,045 410,040 419,166 | — — — | 958,020 0 783,200 | 75,760 130,000 90,000 | 174,181 141,000 8,500 | |||||||
| (1) | Salary amounts include both base salary earned and paid in cash during the fiscal year and the amount of base salary deferred at the election of the executive officer under certain employee benefit plans. The Company’s 2002 fiscal year included 53 weeks, resulting in an additional week of salary. |
| (2) | During 2004, Mr. Marriott received $72,500 in personal financial services and $41,091 in personal use of the Company jet, calculated on the basis of the incremental cost to the Company. |
The other named executives are eligible to receive, subject to certain limitations, personal financial planning services, tax return preparation services and complimentary rooms, food and beverages at Company owned, operated or franchised hotels when on personal travel, which collectively did not exceed $22,000 for any of those individuals during 2004. |
| (3) | Includes restricted stock, deferred stock contracts, and restricted stock units. |
| (4) | The following table shows the total number and value of unvested restricted stock shares/units, deferred bonus shares, or deferred contract shares held by each named executive as of the end of the 2004 fiscal year. The fiscal year end value is based on a per share price for our stock of $62.98, reflecting the closing market price on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. It also shows the number and value of shares that vested in the last fiscal year. |
Name | Shares Vested During Year(a)(#) | Value Realized at Vest Date (a)($) | Total Unvested Shares/Units at Fiscal Year End (#) | Value of Unvested Shares/Units at Fiscal Year End ($) | ||||
J.W. Marriott, Jr. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
William J. Shaw | 26,191 | 1,185,210 | 82,185 | 5,176,011 | ||||
James M. Sullivan | 17,000 | 779,970 | 41,000 | 2,582,180 | ||||
Arne M. Sorenson | 18,413 | 856,830 | 116,723 | 7,351,215 | ||||
Joseph Ryan | 19,077 | 1,018,794 | 38,432 | 2,420,447 |
| (a) | The number and value of shares vested includes shares that vested in the 2004 fiscal year but due to plan deferral features were not released to the named executive. |
The following describes each plan:
Restricted Stock. The Compensation Policy Committee decided to suspend the issuance of Restricted Stock Awards indefinitely commencing with the 2003 fiscal year, and the amount of base salary deferred at the election of the
executive officer under certain employee benefit plans.
(2) Includes restricted stock, deferred bonus stock and deferred stock
contracts, as follows:
Restricted Stock.year. Restricted stock awards are subject to general restrictions, such as continued employment and non-competition, and in some cases, additional performance restrictions such as attainment of financial objectives. Holders of restricted stock receive dividends and exercise voting rights on their restricted shares. Shares are released from restrictions over a 5-, 8- or 10-year period.
Deferred Bonus Stock. For The Compensation Policy Committee decided to suspend the issuance of Deferred Bonus Stock indefinitely commencing with the 2001 fiscal years 1999 and 2000,year. Prior to its suspension, the amount of a deferred bonus stock award equaled 20 percent of each individual'sindividual’s annual cash bonus award, based on the stock price on the first trading day for the next fiscal year. Holders of deferred bonus stock awards do not receive dividends or exercise voting rights on their deferred bonus stock until it is distributed to them. The recipient can designate an award as current, which is distributed in 10 annual installments beginning one year after the award is granted, or deferred, which is distributed in a lump sum or in up to 10 installments following termination of employment. Deferred bonus stock contingently vests in ten equal annual installments beginning one year after we make the award. The deferred bonus stock
program was eliminated for the 2001 fiscal year and beyond.
Deferred Stock Contracts. The Compensation Policy Committee decided to suspend the issuance of Deferred Stock Agreements indefinitely commencing with the 2003 fiscal year. Deferred stock contracts are subject to general restrictions, such as continued employment and non-competition. Holders of deferred stock contracts do not receive dividends or exercise voting rights on their deferred awards until they are distributed to them. 17
(3) The following table shows the total number
Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock unit awards are subject to general restrictions, such as continued employment and non-competition, and in some cases, additional performance restrictions such as attainment of financial objectives. Holders of restricted shares held by,
and the number of deferred bonus sharesstock units do not receive dividends or deferred shares (vested and
unvested) awardedexercise voting rights on their restricted stock units until they are released from restriction. Units are released from restrictions over a 3- to each Named Executive as of the end of the 2001 fiscal
year, and the aggregate value of these shares. The value is based on a per
share price for our5-year period. During 2004, restricted stock of $40.925, reflecting the average of the high
and low trading price on the New York Stock Exchange on December 28, 2001:
Shares
- -------------------------------------
Deferred Restricted Deferred Aggregate Value
Named Executive Bonus Stock Stock Contract Stock at 12/28/01 ($)
--------------- ----------- ---------- -------------- ---------------
Mr. Marriott.. 31,629 0 0 1,294,417
Mr. Shaw...... 30,116 20,402 105,042 6,366,293
Mr. Sorenson.. 5,461 49,000 22,018 3,129,903
Mr. Sullivan.. 25,283 44,404 47,018 4,776,152
Mr. Ryan...... 12,715 41,419 22,018 3,116,521
(4) This column represents matching contributions we made under the 401(k) Plan
and our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Plan") for
fiscal 2001. For J.W. Marriott, Jr., it also includes the amount described
in footnote (5) below.
(5) In 1996, J. W. Marriott, Jr. waived his vested right to receive
post-retirement distributions of cash under the Deferred Plan and Old
Marriott Common Stock under the Old Marriott 1993 Comprehensive Stock
Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"). The payments and stock distributions
waivedunits were awarded to Mr. Marriott in 1995Sorenson for 50,000 restricted stock units and prior years and were
disclosed as required in earlier proxy statements of Old Marriott or of
Marriott Corporation. In connection with this waiver, Old Marriott agreed
to purchase life insurance policiesMr. Ryan for the benefit of a trust established
by Mr. Marriott. We assumed this agreement to purchase life insurance
policies from Old Marriott. The cost of the life insurance policies to us
will not exceed the expected after-tax cost to Old Marriott had it made the
payments and21,000 restricted stock distributions that Mr. Marriott waived. For 2001, the
taxable economic benefit to Mr. Marriott as a result of these life
insurance policies was $24,799. Mr. Marriott also received $48,000 in
personal financial services and $11,326 in personal use of the Company jet.
units.
| (5) | This column represents matching contributions made under the 401(k) Plan of $9,225 for each Named Executive Officer and Company contributions to our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for fiscal 2004 for Mr. Marriott, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Sorenson and Mr. Ryan of $97,387, $328,809, $206,552, $206,142 and $174,181, respectively. Contributions to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan earn a market rate of return based on the available benchmark investment alternatives. For Mr. Marriott, this column also includes the amount described in footnote (6) below. |
| (6) | In 1996, J. W. Marriott, Jr. waived his vested right to receive post-retirement distributions of cash under the Deferred Plan and Old Marriott common stock under the Old Marriott 1993 Comprehensive Stock Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”). The payments and stock distributions waived were awarded to Mr. Marriott in 1995 and prior years and were disclosed as required in earlier proxy statements of Old Marriott or of Marriott Corporation. In connection with this waiver, Old Marriott agreed to purchase life insurance policies for the benefit of a trust established by Mr. Marriott. The Company assumed this agreement to purchase life insurance policies from Old Marriott. The cost of the life insurance policies to us will not exceed the expected after-tax cost to Old Marriott had it made the payments and stock distributions that Mr. Marriott waived. For 2004, the taxable economic benefit to Mr. Marriott as a result of these life insurance policies was $32,343. |
The following two tables show information concerningabout options to purchase our Class A common stock granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 20012004 under the 19982002 Incentive Plan.
Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Name | Stock Options Granted(#) | % of Total Stock Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year (1) | Exercise Price ($/Sh) | Expiration Date (2) | Grant Date Present Value (3)($) | ||||||
J. W. Marriott, Jr. | 329,400 | 17.7 | % | 45.62 | 02/05/2014 | 5,659,092 | |||||
William J. Shaw | 148,240 | 8.0 | % | 45.62 | 02/05/2014 | 2,546,763 | |||||
James M. Sullivan | 98,820 | 5.3 | % | 45.62 | 02/05/2014 | 1,697,728 | |||||
Arne M. Sorenson | 98,820 | 5.3 | % | 45.62 | 02/05/2014 | 1,697,728 | |||||
Arne M. Sorenson | 150,000 | 9.6 | % | 47.60 | 04/29/2014 | 2,676,000 | |||||
Joseph Ryan | 75,760 | 4.1 | % | 45.62 | 02/05/2014 | 1,301,557 |
| (1) | These values represent the options granted as a percentage of |
executives as a percent of total equity value issued to management associates was 6.5% for Mr. Marriott, 2.9% for Mr. Shaw, 1.9% for Mr. Sullivan, 5.5% for Mr. Sorenson and 1.5% for Mr. Ryan. |
| (2) | All options, with the exception of the April 29, 2004 grant to Mr. Sorenson, vest over four years on the anniversary date of the grant at a rate of 25% per year and have a 10-year term. The April 29, 2004 grant to Mr. Sorenson vests over 5 annual installments of 10% after years 1 and 2, 20% after year 3, and 30% after years 4 and 5 and has a 10-year term. Options |
| (3) | These values were established using the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. Assumptions used to calculate the grant date present value of option shares granted for fiscal 2004 were in |
| (a) | Expected Volatility—The standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return calculated on the average daily stock price over a period of time immediately preceding the grant and equal in length to the expected life of the option. The February 2004 grant volatility was 31.35%; the April 2004 volatility was 30.92%. |
| (b) | Risk-Free Interest Rate—The risk-free interest rate was 3.70%. |
| (c) | Dividend Yield—The expected dividend was $0.32 based on our historical dividend policy over the expected life of the option. |
| (d) | Expected Life—The expected life of the option was 7.15 years, calculated based on the historical expected life of previous grants. |
| (e) | Per Share Value |
Aggregated Stock Option/SARStock Appreciation Right (SAR) Exercises in Last Fiscal
Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Name | Company (1) | Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized ($) | Number of Shares Underlying Unexercised Options/ SARs at Fiscal Year End (2) | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Stock Options/SARs at Fiscal Year End (3) | |||||||||
| Exercisable (#) | Unexercisable (#) | Exercisable ($) | Unexercisable ($) | |||||||||||
J.W. Marriott, Jr. | MI HMC | 179,659 372,110 | 8,101,956 4,075,670 | 2,792,978 0 | 1,536,015 0 | 115,532,819 0 | 45,179,426 0 | |||||||
William J. Shaw | MI HMC | 123,292 155,041 | 6,279,033 1,678,149 | 938,877 0 | 784,733 0 | 32,651,951 0 | 24,141,010 0 | |||||||
James M. Sullivan | MI | 71,554 | 4,009,141 | 483,141 | 469,950 | 16,173,936 | 14,141,948 | |||||||
Arne M. Sorenson | MI | 0 | 0 | 319,256 | 493,820 | 9,182,288 | 11,429,380 | |||||||
Joseph Ryan | MI | 46,000 | 1,923,906 | 346,375 | 410,640 | 10,325,201 | 12,686,632 | |||||||
| (1) | “MI” represents options to purchase our Class A common stock, including options to purchase Old Marriott Common Stock which were converted into options to purchase our Class A common stock as part of |
| (2) | The number and terms of some of these options reflect several adjustments made as a result of the 1993 Spin-Off, the spin-off of Host Marriott Services Corporation from Host Marriott Corporation in 1995, the 1998 Spin-Off, and the conversion of Host Marriott Corporation into a real estate investment trust (and a related spin-off transaction) in 1998, each in accordance with the applicable employee benefit plans covering those options. These adjustments preserved, but did not increase or decrease, the economic value of the options on the date of those transactions. |
| (3) | We have based the value of the unexercised stock options on a per share price for Company stock of $62.98 the closing price on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. |
Change in Host Marriott Corporation.
19
(2) Control and Retirement Provisions in Certain Equity Compensation Plans
The number and terms of some of these options reflect several adjustments
made as2002 Incentive Plan provides that, upon a result of the Spin-Off of Old Marriott from Marriott Corporationchange in 1993, the Spin-Off of Host Marriott Services Corporation from Host
Marriott Corporation in 1995, the Spin-Offcontrol of the Company, the Compensation Policy Committee or the Board may provide for the substitution, distribution, exercise, cancellation, exchange for value or waiver of restrictions of the awards outstanding under the 2002 Incentive Plan.
Certain awards under the 2002 Incentive Plan, including deferred bonus stock, restricted stock and certain other share based awards, provide for accelerated vesting if the awardee obtains specific retirement approval from Old Marriott
in 1998, and the conversion2002 Incentive Plan’s Administrative Committee upon attaining age 55 with ten years of Host Marriott Corporation into a real estate
investment trust (and a related Spin-Off transaction) in 1998, each in
accordanceservice with the applicable employee benefit plans covering those
options. These adjustments preserved, but did not increaseCompany or decrease,after twenty years of service. In addition, options held by such approved retirees shall continue to vest and be exercisable for up to five years from the economic valuedate of approved retirement, or if earlier, until expiration of the options.
(3) We have based the value of the unexercised stock options on a per share
price for Company stock of $40.925; and a per share price for Host Marriott
Corporation common stock of $9.45, the average of the respective high and
low trading prices on the New York Stock Exchange on December 28, 2001.
The following table shows information concerning performance-based
restricted stock grants awarded in fiscal 2001 under the 1998 Plan, but which
we subsequently cancelled during the latter part of 2001 in light of last
year's extraordinary political and economic events.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards in Last Fiscal Year (Cancelled)
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BY
THE COMPENSATION POLICY COMMITTEE
The Compensation Policy Committee (the "Committee"“Committee”) is responsible for establishing basic principles related to the compensation programs of the Company and for providing oversight for compensation programs for senior executive officers. The principles include building a strong relationship between shareholder return and executive compensation, providing incentives to achieve both short and long-term goals, and providing an overall level of remuneration whichthat is competitive and reflective of performance. The Committee met four times during 2001.2004. The Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers are not present at the meetings unless requested by the Committee.
Compensation Philosophy and Programs
The Committee'sCommittee’s objective is to establish a total compensation program for the Company that appropriately balances compensation costs with salaries and incentives sufficient to retain and motivate key executives. Senior human resources management of the Company presents proposals and recommendations on senior executive officer compensation to the Committee for theirits review and evaluation. To establish compensation levels, the Committee uses data provided
by the Company that is obtained from independent consultants.outside consultants retained at the Committee’s discretion. The data reflects compensation practices withat companies of approximately Marriott'sMarriott’s size (the comparison group) who participate in a variety of compensation surveys. The Committee believes that targeting compensation between the median and the 75/75th percentile of other large companies appropriately reflects the conditions of the labor market for Company executives. Companies in the comparison group may be included in the S&P Hotel/Motel Index used in the performance chart included in this Proxy Statement; however, the comparison group is not made up exclusively of companies used incomprising that Index. Asindex. Because the Company is comprised of both lodging
and service lines of businesses and also recruits senior executives from outside the hospitality industry, the Committee believes that the broad-based comparison group is a morean appropriate basis for establishing comparablecompetitive pay programs. /
Base Salary
The Company has an executive compensation salary structure approved by the Committee, which includes salary ranges established around a salary grade
midpoint.for each executive level. Each position'sposition’s salary and target bonus opportunity is established based on targeted levels of total cash compensation for similar positions in the survey data. Actual base salaries are set within the prescribed salary range, based on a subjective assessment of factors including tenure, experience and individual performance. This assessment is not subject to weightings or formulas. Individual annual salary increases reflect the position within the salary range, the merit increase guidelines established by the Company, and individual performance over the prior year. The Committee establishes merit increase guidelines based on survey information of annual salary increase budgets for the comparison group, along with an assessment of the Company'sCompany’s labor costs for management employees.
Annual Cash Incentives
The Company has establishedmaintains the 1998Executive Officer Incentive Plan, which is focused on financial objectives. In addition, the Company maintains the Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan, which is focused on human resource and other business requirements, to help motivate the attainment of annual objectives.
21
Under each plan, goals and specific objectives are established for a minimum level, target level, and a maximum level of performance. Senior human resources management of the Company provided
the Committee with recommended individual performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other named executives for the Committee'sCommittee’s review and input. For each objective, actual performance is measured against these levels in order to determine the actual payment. No payment is made if performance fails to meet the minimum level for a particular objective.
The 2001 incentive plans for
For 2004, the Chief Executive Officer Incentive Plan and other senior
executive officersthe Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan included objectives related to Company financial performance, individual performance, customer satisfaction, owner relations and lodging growth objectives.
Stock Incentives
The Committee believes that stock ownership by senior executive management is essential for aligning management'smanagement’s interest with that of shareholders. To emphasize this principle, in February 1999, the Company established stock ownership guidelines for the Company's senior management. The guidelines require the top 65 executives in the Company to own a multiple of their individual salary grade midpoint in Company stock. Executives have five years in which to meet this goal. The majority of the executives have met their goals. Each of the named senior executive officers has met his goal.
The Company grantscontinued to grant stock options as the primary long-term incentive to senior executive officers of the Company. The Company issues restricted stock units to the majority of eligible senior management as their primary long-term incentive. The long-term value and the number of shares subject to options granted to each senior executive officer isand senior management are related to a guideline number established for each eligible level based on the survey data described above. The Committee establishes a competitive range of share awards per eligible position, and individual awards are determined based on a subjective assessment of individual performance, contribution and future potential.
Under the terms of the Company's 1998Company’s 2002 Incentive Plan, awards of restricted stock and
deferred stock contractsunits are also made to key management employees. These awards tend to be relatively infrequent and are used to recognize special performance of key executives or as an employment inducement. The Company considers a number of factors when determining stock grants such as individual performance, the size of competitive long-term awards, key contributions and previous share grants.
In January 2001, sixteen senior executives, including Mr. Marriott,
received a grant of Restricted Stock that was subject to release from
restrictions based on the achievement of performance goals related to the
Company's Return on Invested Capital. Due to extreme changes in the economic
environment and our industry, these grants were later cancelled.
2001
2004 Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and ReportedNamed Executive Officers
The Committee reviewed the 20012004 salaries for J.W. Marriott, Jr., and all other executive officers in February 2001.2004. For 2004, Mr. Marriott'sMarriott’s base pay was maintained at $1,000,000,increased to $1,040,000, resulting in noa 4% base pay increase. This salary isThe other named senior executive officers received base pay increases ranging from 3.5% to 4.1%. These salaries are within the median range for the comparison group. In light of the economic
events following September 2001, Mr. Marriott elected to forgo his salary for
the fourth quarter of 2001. Mr. Shaw received a 5.4% base salary increase, Mr.
Ryan a 5.3% increase, Mr. Sullivan a 9.6% increase, and Mr. Sorenson a 14.4%
increase. All salary increases for the named executive officers were made to
better approximate the median of the comparison group.
22
Under the 1998Executive Officer Incentive Plan, Mr. Marriott'sMarriott’s maximum annual incentive opportunity as a percentage of base salary was 75%62.5% based on attaining an earnings per share objective. Under the Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan, his maximum opportunity was 25% related to individual objectives, 12.5% related to REVPAR results, 12.5% on growth objectives, 6.25% on owner relations, and 12.5%6.25% related to customer satisfaction. For 2001, Mr. Marriott elected to forgo his bonus in lightexceeded performance objectives for earnings per share and growth, achieved the maximum level of performance for owner relations objectives, met the goals for REVPAR, and achieved 99.2% of the economic eventscustomer satisfaction objectives. Mr. Marriott accomplished the majority of September 2001.
his individual objectives and growth objectives. The aggregate target level of bonus award for Mr. Marriott was 90% and the maximum level of bonus award was equal to 125% of eligible fiscal year salary. The total award payment of $1,225,536 corresponded to 117.84% of salary. Mr. Marriott’s annual cash incentive
payment was at the median for the comparison group. From a total cash compensation perspective (base plus bonus), his annual compensation is at the median for the comparison group.
The other named senior executive officers arewere also participants in the 1998Executive Officer Incentive Plan and the Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan. Measures utilized includeincluded Company and, in some cases, business-group cash
flow,earnings per share, REVPAR index, customer satisfaction, owner relations, lodging rooms growth objectives and individual objectives. The aggregate target payments for other named executives were set at 60% to 80% of salary and the maximum aggregate payments from 90% to 110% of salary. Actual total award payments for 20012004 ranged from 25%83.91% to 40%103.7% of salary.
Based on outstanding contributions during the year,their leadership roles and to continue to offer a competitive total compensation program, Mr. ShawSorenson and Mr. Ryan received a deferredrestricted stock contractunit awards in 20012004 of 50,000 shares vesting in equal annual installmentsand 21,000 restricted stock units, respectively. Mr. Sorenson’s award vests over 5 years,installments assuming continued employment. Mr. Sullivan received a restricted
stock grant in 2001 of 30,000 shares, and Mr. Sorenson received a restricted
stock grant in 2001 of 35,000 shares, each subject to release from restrictions
in equal annual amountsRyan’s award vests over 5 years,3 installments assuming continued employment.
In 2001,2004, stock option grants were made to Mr. Marriott and the other named executive officers. Mr. Marriott received an option in February 20012004 to acquire 350,000329,400 shares, with vesting over four years. This grant as well asand similar grants to the other named executive officers waswere within guideline ranges established for theireach executive’s specific salary grade.
level. Based on his leadership role, Mr. Sorenson received an additional option grant in April 2004 to acquire 150,000 shares vesting over 5 annual installments of 10% after years 1 and 2, 20% after year 3, and 30% after years 4 and 5 assuming continued employment.
Impact of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
Under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, provisions were added to the Internal Revenue Code under Section 162(m) that limit the tax deduction for compensation expense in excess of one million dollars paid to each of certain executive officers. However, performance-based compensation can be excluded from the limit so long as it meets certain requirements. The Committee believes payments under the 1998Executive Officer Incentive Plan satisfiesand stock option grants satisfy the requirements for exemption under the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Payments made under thisthe Executive Officer Incentive Plan qualify as
performance-based compensation and constitute the majority of aggregate annual cash incentive amounts payable for Mr. Marriott and all other named executive officers.
The Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan doesand certain restricted stock awards under the 2002 Incentive Plan do not meet the requirement necessaryrequirements for exemption as performance-based compensation; however, the Committee believes that incentives for performance relative to certain Company objectives, such as personnelworkforce planning, customer satisfaction and other non-financial business requirements, as well as time-based equity incentives, are relevant and appropriate. For 2001,2004, the annual salary, plus the bonus paid to named executive officersand other non-performance-based remuneration earned by J.W. Marriott, Jr. and Mr. Sullivan were in each case less than one million dollars after allowing for amounts deferred into the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The total remuneration earned by Mr. Shaw, Mr. Sorenson, and Mr. Ryan in each case exceeded one million dollars. While the Committee reservesbelieves that it is important to preserve the rightability to pay
non-deductiblestructure compensation programs to meet a variety of corporate objectives even if it considers that to be in the best interest of
the shareholders and the Company. Duecompensation is not deductible, due to the Company'sCompany’s focus on performance-based compensation plans and continued deferral of compensation by certain executive officers, the Committee expects that the vast majority of compensation paid to the executive officers as a group will be tax deductible.
23
Summary
The Compensation Policy Committee believes that the compensation programs of the Company are well structured to encourage attainment of objectives and foster a shareholder perspective in management. The Committee feelsbelieves that the awards made in 20012004 were competitive and appropriate and serve shareholders'shareholders’ long-term interest.
Members of the Compensation Policy Committee
Floretta Dukes McKenzie, Chair
Harry J. Pearce
Roger W. Sant, W. Mitt Romney
Chair
Richard S. Braddock
Floretta Dukes McKenzie
Lawrence M. Small
24
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s compensation plans at December 31, 2004.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | 40,856,967 | (1) | $ | 31.36 | 11,518,147 | (2) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders (3) | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Total | 40,856,967 | 11,518,147 | |||||||
| (1) | Includes 8,581,736 shares of deferred stock, deferred stock units, restricted stock and restricted stock units that are not included in the calculation of the Weighted-Average Exercise Price in column (b). |
| (2) | Consists of 6,056,853 securities available for issuance under the 2002 Incentive Plan and 5,461,294 securities available for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
| (3) | All of the Company’s equity compensation plans have been approved by shareholders. |
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the performance of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock from the March 27, 1998 Spin-OffJanuary 1, 2000 to the end of fiscal 2001, and
prior to the Spin-Off, the performance of Old Marriott's common stock since
January 4, 1997,2004 with the performance of the Standard & Poor'sPoor’s Corporation Composite 500 Index and the Standard and Poor's 500Poor’s Hotels, Resorts and Cruise Lines Index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on January 4, 1997,1, 2000, and reinvestment of dividends. In addition, we have assumed that the Sodexho Marriott Services,
Inc. shares received in connection with the Spin-Off were sold on March 27,
1998, and immediately reinvested in the Company's Class A common stock.
We believe that this shareholder return information has only limited relevance to an understanding of our compensation policies during the indicated periods and does not reflect all matters that we considered appropriate in developing our respective compensation strategies.
Performance Graph
[CHART]
Marriott S&P Lodging-Hotels Index S&P 500 Index
International Inc.
1/3/97 100.00 100.00 100.00
1/2/98 170.90 163.10 179.30
1/1/99 159.50 134.10 235.50
12/31/99 174.70 134.00 285.10
12/29/00 235.10 110.80 261.70
12/28/01 236.70 110.80 240.00
1/3/97 1/2/98 1/1/99 12/31/99 12/29/00 12/28/01
------ ------ ------ -------- -------- --------
Marriott International, Inc. 100.0 170.9 159.5 174.7 235.1 236.7
S&P Lodging-Hotels Index.... 100.0 163.1 134.1 134.0 110.8 110.8
S&P 500 Index............... 100.0 179.3 235.5 285.1 261.7 240.0
25
| 1/1/00 | 12/29/00 | 12/28/01 | 1/3/03 | 1/2/04 | 12/31/04 | |||||||
Marriott International, Inc. | 100.0 | 134.7 | 132.1 | 110.9 | 150.4 | 205.2 | ||||||
S&P Lodging-Hotels Index | 100.0 | 99.3 | 93.8 | 94.7 | 138.7 | 201.3 | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100.0 | 90.9 | 80.1 | 62.4 | 77.5 | 85.5 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
JWM Family Enterprises, L.P. ("(“Family Enterprises"Enterprises”) is a Delaware limited partnership majority ownedmajority-owned by J.W. Marriott, Jr., ourthe Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and members of his immediate family.family including John W. Marriott III, a director and executive officer. Family Enterprises indirectly holds varying percentages of ownership interests in a Courtyard hotel in Long Beach, California, a Residence Inn in San Antonio, Texas, a Fairfield Inn in Anaheim, California, a SpringHill Suites hotel in Herndon, Virginia, a Courtyard hotel in Novato, California, a Courtyard hotel and a TownePlace Suites hotel in Milpitas, California, and a Residence Inn in Washington, DC.D.C., a Marriott hotel in West Palm Beach, Florida and a Renaissance hotel in Columbus, Ohio. Our subsidiaries operate each of these properties pursuant to management agreements with entities controlled by Family Enterprises.Enterprises and we expect such arrangements to continue in 2005. In fiscal 2001,2004, we received management fees of approximately $3.7$4 million, plus reimbursement of certain expenses, from our operation of these hotels. Other than in our role as manager, we have no financial involvement in the hotels listed above or in Family Enterprises.
Transactions with Host Marriott Corporation
In 1993, Old Marriottour predecessor company was spun off as a separate public company from its former parent company, Marriott Corporation (which changed its name to Host Marriott Corporation) ("(“Host Marriott"Marriott”). Host Marriott retained the ownership of lodging properties and certain other assets. Old MarriottOur predecessor company continued the businesses of lodging management senior living services, distribution servicesbusiness and certain other businesses. Host Marriott reorganized its business operations in 1998 to qualify as a
real estate investment trust ("REIT"); acquired a portfolio of luxury hotels
for $1.5 billion; and completed partnership roll-ups representing new hotel
property acquisitions approximating $650 million; and divested newly created
lease and sublease interests in substantially all of Host Marriott's lodging
properties, including the properties in its newly acquired portfolio. Effective
as ofAt January 1, 2001, a Host Marriott taxable subsidiary reacquired the lease
and sublease interests that it had divested as part of the 1998 REIT conversion.
In December 2000, we acquired, through an unconsolidated joint venture (the
"Courtyard Joint Venture") with an affiliate of Host Marriott, 120 Courtyard by
Marriott hotels. The acquisition was made pursuant to a settlement of
litigation in which we, Host Marriott, and certain of our and their
subsidiaries and affiliates were defendants. The joint venture was financed
with approximately $200 million in mezzanine debt loaned to the joint venture
by us and with equity contributed in equal shares by us and by Host Marriott.
Our total investment in the joint venture, including the mezzanine debt, is
approximately $300 million. One of our subsidiaries manages these 120 hotels
under long-term agreements.
In recognition of the significant changes in the lodging industry over the
last ten years and the age of our agreements with Host Marriott, many
provisions of which predate our 1993 Spin-Off, we and Host Marriott concluded
that we could mutually enhance the long term strength and growth of both
companies by updating our existing relationship. Accordingly, we are currently
negotiating certain changes to our management agreements for Host
Marriott-owned hotels. The modifications under discussion would, if made, be
effective as of the beginning of our 2002 fiscal year and would remain subject
to the consent of various lenders to the properties and other third parties. If
made, these changes would, among other things,
. Provide Host Marriott with additional approval rights over budgets and
capital expenditures;
. Extend the effective management agreement termination dates for several
hotels;
26
. Expand the pool of hotels that Host Marriott could sell with franchise
agreements to one of our approved franchisees and revise the method of
determining the number of hotels that may be sold without a management
agreement or franchise agreement;
. Lower the incentive management fees payable to us by amounts dependent in
part on underlying hotel profitability at eight hotels;
. Reduce certain expenses to the properties and lower Host Marriott's
working capital requirements;
. Confirm that we and our affiliates may earn a profit (in addition to what
we earn through management fees) on certain transactions relating to Host
Marriott-owned properties, and establish the specific conditions under
which we may profit on future transactions; and
. Terminate our existing right to purchase up to 20 percent of Host
Marriott's outstanding common stock upon certain changes of control and
clarify our rights in each of our management agreements to prevent either
a sale of the hotel to our major competitors or specified changes in
control of Host Marriott involving our major competitors.
We cannot assure you that these negotiations will be successful, that the
changes will be substantially as we have described above, or that the consents
necessary to implement these changes will be obtained. The monetary effect of
the anticipated changes will depend on future events such as the operating
results of the hotels. We do not expect these modifications to have a material
financial impact on us.
At February 28, 2002,31, 2005, J.W. Marriott, Jr., John W. Marriott III, and Richard E. Marriott and their respective immediate family members beneficially owned approximately 5.97.0 percent and 6.9 percent, respectively, of the common stock of Host Marriott.
J.W. Marriott, Jr. is presently a director of Host Marriott, with a term
expiring in May 2002, but is not standing for reelection. Richard E. Marriott,
who has announced his intention to resign from our Board of Directors in May
2002, is the Chairman of the Board of Host Marriott.
Pursuant to agreements with Host Marriott, in 20012004 we:
. operated lodging properties owned or leased by Host Marriott;
. guaranteed Host Marriott's
| · | owned 120 hotels through an unconsolidated joint venture formed in 2000 with an affiliate of Host Marriott (the “Courtyard Joint Venture”); |
| · | operated lodging properties owned or leased by Host Marriott and the Courtyard Joint Venture; |
| · | guaranteed Host Marriott’s performance in connection with certain obligations; and |
| · | provided Host Marriott with various administrative and consulting services and a sublease of office space at the Marriott headquarters building. |
In December 2004, we and
. provided Host Marriott announced the signing of a purchase and sale agreement by which an institutional investor would obtain a 75 percent interest in the Courtyard Joint Venture. We expect the transaction, which is subject to certain closing conditions, to close in early 2005, although we cannot assure you that the sale will be completed. Currently, we and Host Marriott own equal shares in the 120 property joint venture and with various administrativethe addition of the new equity, our percentage interest in the joint venture will decline from 50 percent to 21 percent and consulting
services and a subleaseHost Marriott’s interest will decline from 50 percent to less than 4 percent. Upon closing of office spacethe transaction, our existing mezzanine loan to the joint venture (including accrued interest) totaling approximately $249 million at the Marriott headquarters
building.
Lodging.December 31, 2004 will be repaid.
Lodging. We recognized sales of $2,440$2,423 million and operating profit
(before corporate expensesincome from continuing operations before income taxes and interest)minority interest of $162$123 million in 20012004 from our operation of lodging properties owned or leased by Host Marriott. During 2001,2004, Host Marriott also served as the general partner or managing member of several unconsolidated entities, including the Courtyard Joint Venture, that own lodging properties.properties we manage. We recognized sales of $546$329 million and operating profit
(before corporate expensesincome from continuing
operations before income taxes and interest)minority interest of $40$50 million in 20012004 from our operation of these lodging properties. We also leased land to certain of these
partnerships and recognized land rent income of $19 million in 2001. Included above in amounts recognized from lodging properties owned by unconsolidated entities are sales of $316 million, operating profit (before corporate expenses
and interest) of $25$285 million and land rent income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest of $18$47 million attributablerelated to the Courtyard Joint Venture in 2001.
27
Assuming that the modifications being negotiated with Host Marriott will be
made, ourVenture.
Our lodging operating agreements with Host Marriott and the Courtyard Joint Venture will continue to reflect current market terms and conditions for arrangements between managers and owners of very large hotel portfolios of similar quality.
Financing.
Financing. We have provided financing to Host Marriott with financing for a portion of the cost of acquiring properties to be operated or franchised by us, and we may continue to provide financing to Host Marriott in the future. In 2001,The outstanding principal balance of these loans was $2 million at December 31, 2004, and we recognized less than $1 million in 2004 in interest and fee income from loans tounder these credit agreements with Host Marriott. At December 28, 2001,We also provided the outstanding principalCourtyard Joint Venture with a loan for a portion of the cost of acquiring its 120 hotels in 2000. The balance of loans to Host
Marriott was $7 million. In
addition, we recognized interest income of $26 million in 2001 on the $200
million mezzanine debt provided by usour loan to the Courtyard Joint Venture.
Guarantees.Venture was approximately $249 million as of December 31, 2004.
Guarantees. We have guaranteed the performance of Host Marriott's performanceMarriott and certain of its affiliates to certain lenders and other third parties. These guarantees were limited to $9$8 million at December 28, 2001 and consisted solely of guarantees of certain self-insurance
liabilities.31, 2004. We have not been requiredmade no payments pursuant to make any payments under these guarantees. We lease land to the Courtyard Joint Venture that had an aggregate book value of $184 million at December 31, 2004. This land has been pledged to secure debt of the lessees. We are currently deferring receipt of rentals on this land to permit the lessees to meet their debt service requirements.
Administrative Services.Services. We also provide certain administrative and consulting services to Host Marriott and sublease space at our headquarters building to Host Marriott. In 2001, we wereThe amounts paid approximately $3.8 millionto us in 2004 for these items,services, including reimbursements.
Transactions with Crestline Capital Corporation
In conjunction with its December 1998 conversion toreimbursements, were approximately $170,000.
Certain Relationships
The Company acquired 950,000 shares of Marriott International, Inc. Class A common stock from First Media, L.P. on February 23, 2004 for a REIT, Host Marriott
spun off, in a taxable transaction, a new company called Crestline Capital
Corporation ("Crestline"). After giving effect to a subsequent January 1, 2001
transaction, Host Marriott reacquired leasehold interests inprice per share of $44.50. The agreed upon price was the lodging
properties it originally transferred to Crestline. Subsidiaries of Crestline
continued to own all oftrading price on the senior living communities previously owned by Host
Marriott, and remained successors to Host Marriott under senior living
community management agreements with us. We continue to manage the senior
living communities that were owned by Crestline but sold to a third partyNYSE on January 11, 2002. We believe that our senior living community operating
agreements with Crestline reflect market terms and conditions existingFebruary 23, 2004 at the time the agreements were entered into,transaction was agreed upon. The general partner of First Media, L.P. is a corporation in which Richard E. Marriott is the controlling shareholder.
The Company acquired 160,000 shares of Marriott International, Inc. Class A common stock from the J. Willard and are substantially similar to
operating agreements between us and other third partiesAlice S. Marriott Foundation on December 16, 2004 for facilitiesa price per share of a
similar type.
At March 1, 2002,$62.56. The agreed upon price was the closing price on the date of the transaction. J.W. Marriott, Jr. and Richard E. Marriott serve as trustees of the J. Willard and their
respective immediateAlice S. Marriott Foundation.
Our Company, which was founded by J.W. Marriott, employs a number of members of the Marriott family in management positions in addition to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, J.W. Marriott, Jr. Among the family members beneficially owned approximately 4.5
percentemployed are Mr. Marriott’s sons and 5.5 percent, respectively, of the common stock of Crestline.son-in-law: John W. Marriott III, who serves on the son of J.W.board and as Executive Vice President, Lodging; Stephen G. Marriott, Jr., is a director of Crestline.
In 2001 we recognized sales of $194 millionwho serves as Senior Vice President, Culture and operating profit (before
corporate expensesSpecial Events; David S. Marriott, who serves as Senior Vice President, Global and interest) of $6 million from our management of senior
living communities that are owned by Crestline. We also provide certain
administrativeField Sales; and consulting services to Crestline, and in 2001 weRonald T. Harrison, who serves as Regional Vice President, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, North America. For fiscal 2004, these individuals were paid approximately $246,000, including reimbursements,salary and bonus of $721,125, $290,332, $105,498, and $276,380, respectively.
Jerry W. Cooper, the brother-in-law of John W. Marriott III, serves as Director, Marketing Strategy and was paid salary and bonus of $135,869 for these services.
2004. These family members are compensated at levels comparable to the compensation paid to non-family members in similar positions. Our board of directors believes that the involvement of a significant number of Marriott family members in responsible positions of the Company makes a significant long-term contribution to the value of our corporate name and identity and to the maintenance of Marriott’s reputation for providing quality lodging products.
Mr. Sullivan’s daughter Kathleen S. Tyson, serves as Corporate Director, Ritz-Carlton Projects and Mr. Sullivan’s son Brian P. Sullivan, serves as Senior Manager, Competitive Analysis. For fiscal 2004, salary and bonus paid to each of the individuals totaled $157,934 and $61,963, respectively. These family members are compensated at levels comparable to the compensation paid to non-family members in similar positions. Mr. Ryan owns 2.5 percent of PT Metrics, LLC, a company which manufactures a personal fitness product offered to hotel guests in connection with the Company’s In-Room Fitness program which was launched in January 2005. Mr. Ryan’s son-in-law, Alden M. Mills, is Chief Executive Officer and owns 36 percent of PT Metrics. The Company made no payments to PT Metrics, LLC in fiscal 2004 but expects to make payments in 2005.
ITEM 2--RATIFICATION2—RATIFICATION OF THE RESTATEMENTAPPOINTMENT OF THE MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
1998 COMPREHENSIVE STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN INCLUDINGPRINCIPAL INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s principal independent auditor for fiscal 2005. Ernst & Young LLP, a firm of independent public accountants, has served as the Company’s principal independent auditor since May 3, 2002. Ernst & Young LLP will examine and report to shareholders on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and are expected to be available to respond to questions.
The Board of Directors has put this proposal before the shareholders because the Board believes that seeking shareholder ratification of the selection of the independent financial auditor is good corporate practice. If the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not ratified, the Audit Committee will evaluate the basis for the shareholders’ vote when determining whether to continue the firm’s engagement.
The Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s principal independent auditor for fiscal 2005.
ITEM 3—APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE OF 95 MILLION SHARES OF THE COMPANY'SCOMPANY’S CLASS A COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE 19982002 INCENTIVE PLAN
On February 7, 2002, the Board approved, subject to shareholder
ratification, the restatement of the 1998 Plan as the Marriott International,
Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan
28
(the "2002 Plan"), a copy of which is set forth in Appendix B.
The 2002 Plan is
substantially the same as the 1998 Plan, except for the changes described
below. As one of the changes, the Company is asking shareholders to ratifyapprove an amendment to the 2002 Incentive Plan to increase inby 5 million the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2002 Plan by
9 million shares.Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors approved this amendment on February 3, 2005. This amendment would increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2002 Incentive Plan from 7180 million to 8085 million. At March 1,
2002,As of December 31, 2004, approximately 6640.9 million shares of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock had
been issued under the 1998 Plan, approximately 49 million shares were subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2002 Incentive Plan, 33 million shares have been
issued under the 2002 Incentive Plan, and approximately 56.1 million shares remained available for future issuance.
The purpose of the 2002 PlanIncentive Plan’s purpose is to promote and enhance the long-term growth of the Company by aligning the interests of the employeesofficers and directors of the Company with those of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders. The proposed share increase will ensure that a sufficient reserve of the Company’s Class A common stock is available under the 2002 Incentive Plan to attract and retain the services of key individuals essential to the Company'sCompany’s long-term growth and success. We maintain no other
plans providing for the grant of stock awards other than the 1998 Plan, which
has been amended and renamed the 2002 Plan, subject to shareholder approval.
Old
Marriott shareholders approved the 19982002 Incentive Plan at a specialthe annual shareholder meeting on March 17, 1998.May 3, 2002. The 2002 Incentive Plan is an amendment and restatement of the Marriott International, Inc. 1998 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, that became effective on March 28, 1998, immediately1998. Since it was last approved by shareholders in 2002, the Board has not amended the 2002 Incentive Plan other than to clarify language regarding the forfeiture of awards upon misconduct. A brief description of the material features of the 2002 Incentive Plan is attached as Appendix C. A copy of the 2002 Incentive Plan was filed as Appendix B to our definitive proxy statement filed on March 28, 2002, and is available upon written request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary.
The Board recommends a vote FOR approval of an increase of 5 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock authorized for issuance under the 2002 Incentive Plan.
ITEM 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ESTABLISH ANNUAL ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTORS
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis (Editor of Highlights and Lowlights, Watergate Office Building, 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 215, Washington, D.C. 20037), a shareholder who owns 400 shares of Company common stock, has notified the Company of her intention to propose the following resolution at the Spin-OffAnnual Meeting of Shareholders:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of Marriott International, recommend that the Board of Directors take the necessary steps to reinstate the election of directors ANNUALLY, instead of the stagger system which was recently adopted.
In support of the resolution, Mrs. Davis has submitted the following statement:
The great majority of New York Stock Exchange listed corporations elect all their directors each year. We have outstanding directors, but they should be willing to be elected EACH year, instead of every third year.
This insures that ALL directors will be more accountable to ALL shareholders each year and to a certain extent prevents the self-perpetuation of the Board.
If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution.
Board Response
The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against it for the following reasons.
The current classified board structure has been in place since the Company’s shareholders approved it in 1998. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, the Board is divided into three classes with
directors elected to staggered three-year terms. Approximately one-third of the directors stand for election each year, and the entire Board can be replaced in the course of three annual meetings, all held within approximately two years. The Board believes that a classified board provides many benefits to an active, professional board.
Three-year staggered terms provide stability and ensure that, at any given time, a majority of the Company’s directors have prior experience as a Company director and solid knowledge of the Company’s complex business and long-term strategy. This enhances a company’s ability to engage in long-term strategic planning. In addition, experienced directors knowledgeable about the Company’s business are better positioned to make decisions that are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, particularly with a company like ours that operates in a rapidly changing and cyclical industry.
A classified board structure augments a board’s ability to negotiate the best results for shareholders in a potential takeover situation. The Board believes that a classified board structure prevents a hostile acquiror and arbitragers that have only a short-term focus from Oldopportunistically seizing upon our Company during a normal business cycle by encouraging the acquiror to negotiate with the Board or to take its proposal to shareholders over a period of at least two annual meetings. This gives the incumbent directors additional opportunity to evaluate the adequacy and fairness of any takeover proposal, negotiate on behalf of all shareholders and weigh alternative methods of maximizing shareholder value. Moreover, although a classified board is intended to cause a person seeking to obtain control of the Company to negotiate with the Board, the existence of a classified board will not prevent a person from accomplishing a hostile acquisition.
The Board believes that the benefits of the current classified board structure do not come at the cost of directors’ accountability to shareholders. Directors elected to three-year terms are equally accountable to shareholders as directors elected annually, since all directors are required to uphold their fiduciary duties to the Company and its shareholders, regardless of the length of their term of office. In our view, the annual election of approximately one-third of the Company’s directors provides long-term shareholders with an orderly means to effect change and communicate their views on the performance of the Company and its directors.
The Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have carefully considered this proposal and the arguments for and against a classified board. The Board has concluded that the Company’s classified board structure continues to promote the best interests of the shareholders.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
ITEM 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO REQUIRE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS BY A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST AT AN ANNUAL MEETING
Mr. Matthew Hernandez (Corporate Governance Advisor) on behalf of the Sheet Metal Worker’s National Pension Fund (601 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 500, Alexandria, VA 22314) a beneficial owner of 7,100 shares of Company common stock, has notified the Company of his intention to propose the following resolution at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
RESOLVED: That the shareholders of Marriott International, Inc. (“Company”) hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s governance documents (certificate to incorporation or bylaws) to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders.
In support of the resolution, Mr. Hernandez has submitted the following statement:
Our Company is incorporated in Delaware. Among other issues, Delaware corporate law addresses the issue of the level of voting support necessary for a specific action, such as the election of corporate directors. Delaware law provides that a company’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws may specify the number of votes that shall be necessary for the transaction of any business, including the election of directors. (DGCL, Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter VII, Section 216). Further, the law provides that if the level of voting support necessary for a specific action is not specified in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation, directors “shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors.”
Our Company presently uses the plurality vote standard for the election of directors. We feel that it is appropriate and timely for the Board to initiate a change in the Company’s director election vote standard. Specifically, this shareholder proposal urges that the Board of Directors initiate a change to the director election vote standard to provide that in director elections a majority vote standard will be used in lieu of the Company’s current plurality vote standard. Specifically, the new standard should provide that nominees for the board of directors must receive a majority of the vote cast in order to be elected or re-elected to the Board.
Under the Company’s current plurality vote standard, a director nominee in a director election can be elected or re-elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even while a substantial majority of the votes cast are “withheld” from that director nominee. So even if 99.9% of the shares “withhold” authority to vote for a candidate or all the candidates, a 0.01% “for” vote results in the candidate’s election or re-election to the board. The proposed majority vote standard would require that a director receive a majority of the vote cast in order to be elected to the Board.
It is our contention that the proposed majority vote standard for corporate board elections is a fair standard that will strengthen the Company’s governance and the Board. Our proposal is not intended to limit the judgment of the Board in crafting the requested governance change. For instance, the Board should address the status of incumbent directors who fail to receive a majority vote when standing for re-election under a majority vote standard or whether a plurality director election standard is appropriate in contested elections.
We urge your support of this important direction election reform.
Board Response
The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against it because the Company’s current plurality voting requirement is a well-established standard that operates fairly under Delaware law and because the Company has in place other means that it believes are equally effective for shareholders to communicate their views regarding director nominees.
The Company has a history of electing, by a plurality, strong and independent Boards. In each of the last three years, each director was elected by a vote of at least 96% of votes cast. The Company believes that the Proposal was not submitted to the Company out of any particular concern that the proponent may have with the composition or governance structure of the Company’s Board of Directors, but instead as part of a broad-based campaign by the proponent and others to advance debate over existing voting standards.
The Board believes that the current plurality voting requirement for the election of directors also is fair and impartial in that it applies equally to any candidate who is nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The plurality voting threshold is the accepted standard for the election of directors of publicly traded companies. Under this approach, the nominees that receive the most votes are elected as directors, regardless of whether the candidate is nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or by a shareholder. For example, a shareholder nominee could be elected under the current standard if the number of votes cast for that nominee exceeds the number of votes cast for one or more other nominees, including persons nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If the proposal were adopted, a shareholder nominee might fail to win election to the Board even if that person received more votes than an incumbent director nominee, simply because the shareholder nominee did not receive a majority of the votes cast.
Finally, the proposal would not change the effect of votes when an incumbent director is renominated and not opposed by another nominee. Consistent with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company’s bylaws provide that directors shall hold office from the date of their election until their successors have been elected and qualified. An incumbent director who did not receive a majority of the votes cast would therefore remain in office until such person’s successor was elected and qualified. In those circumstances, the Board’s recourse would be to seek a director’s resignation or removal. However, those are the same actions that the Board may take under the existing plurality vote standard if an incumbent director ever experienced a high number of “withhold” votes. As a result, the majority vote standard advocated in the Proposal would not affect the outcome of uncontested annual meeting votes to re-elect incumbent directors.
Our Board believes that the Company already has a strong corporate governance process designed to identify and propose director nominees who will serve the best interests of the Company and all shareholders. Director nominees are evaluated and recommended for election by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is comprised solely of independent, nonemployee directors. In recommending nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a variety of factors, as described on page 15 of this proxy statement. The Company also has published in this proxy statement information on how shareholders can communicate their views on potential nominees or other matters with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In light of the foregoing, our Board believes the existing plurality voting standard and the role of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provide an effective mechanism for electing an effective Board that is committed to delivering long-term shareholder value.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
The SEC allows us to deliver a single proxy statement and annual report to an address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This delivery method, referred to as “householding,” can result in significant cost savings for us. In order to take advantage of this opportunity, we and banks and brokerage firms that hold your shares have delivered only one proxy statement and annual report to multiple shareholders who share an address unless one or more of the shareholders has provided contrary instructions. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A shareholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the
proxy statement and annual report, now or in the future, may obtain one, without charge, by addressing a request to the Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Dept. 52/862, Marriott Drive, Washington, D.C. 20058 or by calling (301) 380-8999. You may also obtain a copy of the proxy statement and annual report from the Company’s website(http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Info and SEC Filings.” Shareholders sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future should submit their request by contacting us in the same manner. If you are the beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of the Company’s shares and wish to receive only one copy of the proxy statement and annual report in the future, you will need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.
The Company’s management knows of no other matters that may be presented for consideration at the 2005 annual meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote such proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
Any shareholder who would like a copy of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K may obtain one, without charge, by addressing a request to the Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Dept. 52/862, Marriott Drive, Washington, D.C. 20058. The Company’s copying costs will be charged if copies of exhibits to the 10-K are requested. You may also obtain a copy of the 10-K, including exhibits, from the Company’s website (http://www.marriott.com/investor) by clicking on “Corporate Info and SEC Filings.”
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
Dorothy M. Ingalls |
Secretary |
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
| I. | Purpose; Statement of Policy |
| A. | The purpose of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is to represent and assist the Board of Directors in overseeing: (i) the accounting, reporting, and financial practices of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the Company’s internal control environment and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence; and (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. The Committee shall also prepare the report for the Company’s annual proxy statement required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). |
| B. | The Committee has revised and amended this Charter as part of its continuing commitment to the integrity and importance of the financial reporting process and to reflect recent changes in law. The Committee recognizes that these changes are ongoing, and, accordingly, the Committee will from time to time consider such further modifications to this charter as may be necessary or appropriate in light of further changes in law, rule, regulation or best practice. |
| II. | Members and Terms of Office |
| A. | The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, appoints the members of the Committee, which shall be composed of at least three Directors, and designates one member to serve as Committee Chair. Each member of the Committee shall be financially literate, as determined by the Board of Directors, and must at all times be “independent,” as defined by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the SEC. At least two members of the Committee must also be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC requirements. |
| B. | Members of the Committee serve until the next Annual Meeting of the Board of Directors or until their successors are appointed. |
| III. | Meetings |
| A. | The Committee will hold at least four (4) regular meetings each year and meetings prior to each quarterly earnings release, as well as such additional meetings as the Committee Chair may deem necessary or appropriate. Minutes of each Committee Meeting will be submitted to the Board of Directors and the Committee Chair will report to the full Board of Directors on matters discussed at the most recent Committee Meeting. Meetings may take place in person or telephonically at such times and places as the Committee Chair may determine. One-half of the members of the Committee will constitute a quorum. |
| B. | To provide access to the Committee for the internal auditors, independent auditors, and key financial management, the Committee will request the attendance at its regular meetings or otherwise of the Chief Audit Executive (“Chief Audit Executive”) and such other members of the Company’s management as circumstances may require. |
| C. | The Committee will meet separately in executive session, at each regularly scheduled meeting, exclusively with each of the Chief Audit Executive and the Independent Auditors |
(defined below) and, at the Committee’s discretion, exclusively with its own members and/or with management. Annually, the Committee shall meet in executive session with the Disclosure Committee or more frequently at their discretion. |
| IV. | Duties and Responsibilities |
Consistent with and subject to applicable law and rules or listing standards promulgated by the SEC, NYSE, or other applicable regulatory authority, the Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities.
| A. | Relationship with Independent Auditors |
| 1. | The Committee will appoint, oversee and determine the compensation of any registered public accounting firm (the “Independent Auditors”) employed by the Company for the purposes of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work, and the Independent Auditor shall report directly to the Committee. The Committee has sole authority to approve all terms and fees associated with any audit engagement. The Committee will review, at least annually, a report describing the Independent Auditor’s internal quality control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five (5) years regarding an audit carried out by the Independent Auditor, and any steps taken to address such issues. |
| 2. | The Committee will approve in advance all audit engagement fees and terms of all audit services to be provided by the Independent Auditor. (By approving the audit engagements, the audit service shall be deemed to have been pre-approved.) |
| 3. | The Committee will establish policies and procedures for the engagement of the Independent Auditor and pre-approval of any permissible non-audit services to be performed by the Independent Auditor. The Committee will, at least annually, (i) consider the independence of the Independent Auditor and whether the performance of permissible non-audit services is compatible with the auditor’s independence, and (ii) review a report by the Independent Auditor describing any relationships between the Independent Auditor and the Company or any other relationships that may adversely affect the independence of the Independent Auditor. |
| B. | Relationship with the Chief Audit Executive |
| 1. | The Chief Audit Executive will have a direct reporting line to the Committee to communicate any findings or concerns relative to management activities, financial reporting risks or found discrepancies. |
| 2. | The Committee will annually review with the Chief Audit Executive and approve the internal audit department’s annual plan and review the results of executing that plan. |
| 3. | The Committee will meet with the appropriate management personnel to discuss the annual performance of the Chief Audit Executive and approve the proposed compensation established using processes established by the Compensation Committee. |
| C. | Risk Assessment and Control Environment |
The Committee will periodically review and discuss the Company’s business and financial risk management and risk assessment policies and procedures with senior management, the Independent Auditor, and the Chief Audit Executive. The Committee will review and discuss with the Chief Audit Executive the scope, progress, and results of the internal audit program.
The Committee will at least annually:
| 1. | Obtain a report from the Independent Auditors discussing, among other items, critical accounting policies and alternative treatments of financial information discussed with management; |
| 2. | Review major issues concerning accounting policies and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of such principles; and |
| 3. | Review any analyses prepared by management and/or the Independent Auditors setting forth significant financial reporting issues and related judgments. |
| D. | Internal Controls and Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The Committee will periodically review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control environment, including any significant changes or deficiencies in internal controls. The Committee will also review the annual attestation and report of the Independent Auditor on management’s evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and procedures over financial reporting. In connection with this review, the Committee will obtain and discuss:
| 1. | Reports from the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Independent Auditors on any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls with the identification of any material weakness; |
| 2. | Any fraud or other irregularity (whether or not material) that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control environment; and |
| 3. | Management’s evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. |
| E. | Financial Reporting |
| 1. | The Committee will review the Company’s quarterly and annual results with senior management and the Independent Auditors prior to the public release of those results. |
| 2. | The Committee will meet to review and discuss with senior management and the Independent Auditor the Company’s annual audited and quarterly financial statements, including the Company’s specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” including critical accounting policies. |
| 3. | The Committee will review with senior management and the Independent Auditor the Company’s earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and, from time to time, management will provide the Committee with an overview of the information presented, or to be presented, to rating agencies. |
| 4. | The Committee will at least annually review the following with the Independent Auditors (and management, as appropriate): |
| · | The Independent Auditor’s views of the quality of the Company’s accounting principles setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements. |
| · | Any disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles. |
| · | Major issues regarding the accounting principles applied, especially significant estimates made by management or significant changes in accounting principles and financial statement presentation. |
| · | Significant related party transactions or other significant conflicts of interest. |
| · | Significant audit adjustments. |
| · | Any difficulties encountered during the audit, including any restrictions on the scope of work or access to information. |
| · | Any other matters related to the conduct of the audit that must be communicated to the Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. |
| · | Recommend to the Board, based on the foregoing, whether the financial statements should be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| 5. | The Committee will meet regularly with in-house counsel to discuss legal matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements. The Committee may meet with outside counsel as the Committee deems appropriate. |
| 6. | The Committee will prepare an Audit Committee Report for inclusion in the Company’s annual proxy statement. |
| F. | Compliance |
The Committee will oversee the Company’s compliance systems with respect to legal and regulatory requirements and review the Company’s compliance policies and its programs to monitor compliance with these policies. In this regard, the Committee will:
| 1. | At least annually review with management, the General Counsel and the Chief Audit Executive the Company’s programs to ensure compliance with its Ethical Conduct Policy (MIP-1) and the Business Conduct Guide. These policies will be posted on the Company’s public website; and |
| 2. | Establish and oversee a procedure for the oversight and reporting to the Committee of the receipt, retention, treatment, and closure of complaints to the Company concerning (i) accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; or (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by Company employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
| G. | Hiring Employees of Independent Auditors |
The Committee will establish policies for the hiring of employees and former employees of the Independent Auditors.
| H. | Periodic Review of Charter; Function of Audit Committee |
The Committee will at least annually review and assess the adequacy of this Charter and will submit proposed revisions to the Charter to the Board of Directors for approval. In addition, the Committee will at least annually evaluate its own performance.
| I. | Investigations |
The Committee may investigate suspected improprieties on any material matter, using special counsel or outside experts when necessary or appropriate.
| V. | Retention of Outside Advisors |
The Committee may, without further action of the Board of Directors, retain for its own account and service any external advisors, attorneys, consultants, and accountants (collectively, “Advisors”) it deems necessary to carry out the Committee’s purposes. The Company will adequately fund the costs and expenses, as determined by the Committee, of these Advisors.
(Excerpt from the Company’s Governance Principles)
INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS
A majority of the directors must be independent and it is the board’s goal that at least two-thirds of the directors be independent. To be considered “independent,” the board must determine that a director has no direct or indirect material relationship with Marriott. The board has established the following guidelines to assist it in determining director independence:
a. A director is not independent if, within the preceding three years: (i) the director was employed by Marriott or a Marriott affiliate, or Marriott’s independent auditor or otherwise affiliated with Marriott’s independent auditor; (ii) an immediate family member of the director was employed by Marriott or a Marriott affiliate as an executive officer or by Marriott’s independent auditor in a professional capacity; (iii) the director is, or in the past three years has been, part of an interlocking directorate in which the director is employed by another company for which an executive officer of Marriott is a director who serves on the compensation committee of that other company; or (iv) the director receives, or an immediate family member receives, more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from Marriott, other than director and committee fees or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).
b. The following commercial or charitable relationships are not material relationships that would impair a Marriott director’s independence: (i) service as an executive officer of another company that does business with Marriott where the annual sales to, or purchases from, Marriott are in an amount equal to or less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of the consolidated gross annual revenues of that other company; (ii) service as an executive officer of another company which is indebted to Marriott, or to which Marriott is indebted, where the total amount of either company’s indebtedness to the other is less than two percent of the total consolidated assets of the other company; and (iii) service by a Marriott director or his or her immediate family member as an officer, director or trustee of a charitable organization, where Marriott’s discretionary charitable contributions to that organization are in an amount equal to or less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of that organization’s consolidated gross annual revenues. The board annually reviews all commercial and charitable relationships of directors, and publishes whether directors previously identified as independent continue to satisfy the foregoing tests.
c. For relationships not covered by the guidelines in paragraph (b) above, the determination of whether the relationship is material or not, and therefore whether the director would be independent or not, shall be made by the directors who satisfy the independence guidelines set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) above.
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2002 COMPREHENSIVE STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN SUMMARY
The principal terms of the 2002 Plan, including changes to the 1998Incentive Plan are summarized below.
Shares Available under the Plan
The 19982002 Incentive Plan currently provides for the issuance of 7180 million shares of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock. Approximately 36.7As proposed to be amended, 5 million shares would be added to the number of shares available for issuance under the 2002 Incentive Plan, resulting in a total of 85 million shares being subject to the 2002 Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2004, approximately 40.9 million shares of the original share authorization forCompany’s Class A common stock were subject to outstanding awards granted under the 1998 Plan were used to convert
then-existing awards under Old Marriott's 1996 Comprehensive Stock2002 Incentive Plan, following the Spin-Off, leaving approximately 19.333 million shares have been issued under the 2002 Incentive Plan, and approximately 6.1 million shares remained available for new awards since March 28, 1998. During 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
andfuture issuance.
The 2002 awards were granted with respect to approximately 7.4 million shares,
7.8 million shares, 6.0 million shares, 5.8 million shares, and 8.0 million
shares, respectively, under the 1998 Plan.
The 2002Incentive Plan provides that no employee will be eligible to receive awards covering more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock (up from 500,000 under the
1998 Plan)Class A common stock in any one fiscal year (excluding for this purpose any conversion awards in connection with the 1998 Spin-Off described below). The number of shares available and subject to outstanding awards, as well as this limitation, will be appropriately adjusted by the Compensation Policy Committee in the event of any change in capitalization, such as a stock split, or a corporate transaction, such as a merger, consolidation, separation, including a spinoff or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not taxable) or any partial or complete liquidation of the Company. The 1998
Plan required that no more than 20% of the shares available will be issued with
respect to awards other than stock options and non-employee director awards.
Administration
The 2002 Plan removes this restriction to allow greater flexibility for the
Compensation Policy Committee to design competitive compensation packages for
employees.
Administration
The 2002Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Policy Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company, the members of which are non-employee directors of the Company. The
29
willmay provide for the substitution, vesting, distribution, exercise, cancellation, or
exchange for value, or the waiver of any existing terms and conditions of the outstanding awards.
Eligibility
Employees of the Company (including employees who are also members of the Board) are eligible to participate in the 2002 Incentive Plan. The Compensation Policy Committee has discretion to determine which employees will receive awards. Non-employee directors of the Company are eligible solely for purposes of receiving certain director stock awards and making deferral elections with respect to director fees. In addition, employees and non-employee directors of the Company, and certain individuals who are former employees of the Company and its predecessors, received certain conversion awards in connection with the 1998 Spin-Off.
Type of Awards
Stock Option Awards. Under the 2002 Incentive Plan, options may be granted to employees that either qualify or do not qualify (nonqualified awards) for tax treatment as "incentive“incentive stock options" options”
within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. All outstanding stock option awards under the 2002 Incentive Plan are nonqualified. The option price may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of Class A common stock on the date the option is granted. The 2002 Incentive Plan prohibits repricing of option awards. Approximately 3,00065 employees are eligible for the management stock option awards program.
Each option may have a term of up to 15 years, as determined by the Compensation Policy Committee. Since February 2001, stock options have been issued with a 10-year term; stock options issued prior to that have 15-year terms. If an optionee ceases to be an employee or goes on leave of absence for more than 12 months (except in the case of a leave approved by the Compensation Policy Committee) while holding an exercisable option, the option will terminate if not exercised within the following three months. Nonqualified options granted to optionees who subsequently become "approved retirees"“approved retirees” (termination of employment by reason of permanent disability or retirement with approval from the Compensation Policy Committee after 20 years of service or after attaining age 55 with 10 years of service and while a noncompetition agreement is honored) will continue to vest and will not expire until the earlier of (i) the expiration of the option in accordance with its original term or (ii) five years from the date of termination of employment. (Prior to
amendment, the 1998 Plan provided one year for exercise of a vested option by
an employee who terminated by reason of permanent disability.) If an optionee dies while employed by the Company, more than one year after the date the
options are granted, the remaining options may be exercised until the earlier
of the expiration date for such options or one year after the optionee's death.
If an optionee dies while an approved retiree, all the optionee'soptionee’s options become fully vested and may be exercised until the earlier of the expiration date for such options or one year after the optionee'soptionee’s death. If an optionee who is not an approved retiree dies within three months after termination of employment, the optionee'soptionee’s remaining options may be exercised to the same extent and during the same period that the optionee could have exercised the options if the optionee had not died.
Restricted Stock Awards. The 2002 Incentive Plan provides additional compensation incentives to key employees in the form of shares of restricted stock of the Company. Approximately 50 key employees are eligible to receive restricted
stock awards based on theThe Compensation Policy Committee's
30
guidelines.Committee decided to suspend the issuance of Restricted Stock Awards indefinitely commencing with the 2003 fiscal year. Delivery of shares is subject to the lapse of a restriction period, continued employment with the Company and satisfaction of such other requirements as may be imposed by the Compensation Policy Committee, including, but not limited to, achievement of specific performance objectives of the Company, the business unit or the individual. A percentage of the shares subject to an award of restricted stock, as determined by the Compensation Policy Committee, may be released from restriction following an employee'semployee’s retirement with the Committee'sCommittee’s approval at or beyond age 55 with 10 years of service or with 20 years of service. Shares are also released from restriction upon the employee'semployee’s death or permanent disability.
Deferred Stock Awards. Deferred shares of Class A common stock may be granted to employees annually as Deferred Stock Bonus Awards or Deferred Stock Agreements. The Compensation Policy Committee decided to suspend the issuance of Deferred Stock Bonus Awards and Deferred Stock Agreements indefinitely commencing with the 2001 and 2003 fiscal year. Approximately
85 key employees are eligible for Deferred Stock Agreements.
years, respectively.
Deferred Stock Bonus Awards previously granted represented a part of the annual performance bonus awards to employees. Eligible award recipients were able to elect either a current award or a deferred award. A current award is distributed in 10 annual installments commencing one year after the award is granted. Any undistributed shares subject to a current award are forfeited and the award terminated if the employee'semployee’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason other than permanent disability, death or termination of employment with retirement approval from the Compensation Policy Committee at or beyond age 55 with 10 years of service termination of employmentor after 20 years of service with retirement approval from the Compensation Policy Committee,
permanent disability or death.service. Any undistributed shares not subject to forfeiture continue to be paid to the employee or the employee's
employee’s beneficiary under the distribution schedule that would have applied to those shares if the employee had not terminated employment, or over such shorter period as the Compensation Policy Committee may determine.
A deferred award will be distributed to the recipient, as elected by such recipient, either in a lump sum or in up to 10 installments beginning the January following termination of employment. Deferred award shares contingently vest pro rata in annual installments commencing one year after the award is granted to the employee, and continuing on each January 2 thereafter until the expiration of a 10-year period from the commencement date. All shares subject to the deferred award will vest upon permanent disability, death or termination of employment with retirement approval from the Compensation Policy Committee after reaching age 55 with 10 years of service termination of employmentor after 20 years of service with retirement approval from the Compensation Policy Committee,
permanent disability or death.service. Vesting will stop when employment terminates for any other reason.
Vested deferred shares awarded pursuant to a Deferred Stock Agreement are distributed in 10 consecutive annual installments or over such shorter period as the Compensation Policy Committee may direct. The distribution will commence in the January following the date the employee retires or becomes permanently disabled or otherwise ceases to be an employee of the Company. Under some awards, distribution is deferred to age 65 following cessation of employment. Shares vest contingently over a specified term or in pro rata annual installments until age 65. A percentage of the shares subject to a Deferred Stock Agreement, as determined by the Compensation Policy Committee, will vest following an employee'semployee’s retirement with the Committee'sCommittee’s approval at or beyond age 55 with 10 years of service or with 20 years of service. Shares also vest upon the employee'semployee’s death or permanent disability.
Special Recognition Stock Awards. The 2002 Incentive Plan provides for awards designed to provide recognition of employee performance for special efforts on behalf of the Company. While all full-time, nonunion employees will be eligible, actual awards are limited in the discretion of the Compensation Policy Committee.
31
Other Awards.Awards. The Compensation Policy Committee may grant to employees any other awards denominated or payable in cash, Class A common stock, a Class A common stock equivalent or appreciation unit or security convertible into Class A common stock or in any combination of these forms. The other share-based awards may be issued alone or in tandem with other awards and made subject to any terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Policy Committee and specified in the award agreements. In 2003, the Company began issuing restricted stock units under this provision of the 2002 Incentive Plan, which provide for the deferred transfer of shares of Class A common stock upon expiration of certain restrictions indicated in the award agreements. The restrictions commonly lapse evenly over a four-year period. Approximately 3,300 employees are eligible for restricted stock units.
The Compensation Policy Committee also may grant cash performance-based awards not based on Class A common stock on such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. No individual may receive a payment with respect to a cash performance-based award in excess of $4 million in any calendar year.
Performance Measures.Measures. In order to comply with the requirements for exclusion from the limit on the tax deduction of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Policy Committee may condition the grant or payment of awards to employees on the attainment of performance objectives. Under the 19982002 Incentive Plan, the performance objectives are measured by
one or more of the following factors regarding the Company or the applicable business unit: (i) consolidated cash flows, (ii) consolidated financial reported earnings, (iii) consolidated economic earnings, (iv) earnings per share of Class A common stock, (v) business unit financial reported earnings, (vi) business unit economic earnings, (vii) business unit cash flow, (viii) return on invested capital, (ix) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and (viii)amortization (“EBITDA”), and (x) business unit EBITDA, and (xi) appreciation in the price of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock, considered alone or as measured against the performance of a group of companies approved by the Compensation Policy Committee. The 2002 Plan adds to this list
performance objectives measured by one or more of the following factors: (i)
return on invested capital, (ii) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), and (iii) business unit EBITDA.
Directors'
Directors’ Stock Awards and Fee Deferral Elections. The Board may, after each annual meeting of the shareholders, designate non-employee directors who will receive awards of deferred shares of Class A common stock. The awards are fully vested when granted. The awards are distributed in shares of Class A common stock over a ten-year period following retirement from the Board. Non-employee directors are directors who are not full-time, salaried employees of the Company.
The 2002 Incentive Plan also provides for the deferral of fees for non-employee directors at their election. The election must be made prior to an Annual Meeting and remains in effect until the next Annual Meeting. The amounts deferred are credited, as of the date of deferral, to a bookkeeping account as stock units. The number of stock units credited to the account is equal to the fee amount divided by the per share value of Class A common stock on the date the fee amount would have been paid. The stock units are fully vested when credited to the accounts. The accounts are credited with additional stock units as of each dividend payment date on the Class A common stock, to reflect the dividend payment payable on shares of Class A common stock. Upon a non-employee director'sdirector’s resignation, retirement or death (or if the non-employee director is not re-elected), the stock units in the director'sdirector’s account will be paid in an equal number of shares of Class A common stock in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period as elected by the director.
The 2002 Incentive Plan also provides for non-employee directors to elect to receive all or any part of his or her annual retainer in the form of a stock option. The stock option, if elected, has a value, determined by the Compensation Policy Committee based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model, equal to the amount of the annual retainer the non-employee director elects to receive in the form of a stock option. The election is made on or before each Annual Meeting and the valuation is made as of the first full trading day following the Annual Meeting (the date of the grant). The option becomes fully vested on 32
Non-employee directors are not eligible for other stock awards.
Conversion Awards.Awards. Pursuant to agreements entered into in connection with the 1998 Spin-Off, certain conversion awards were made under the 1998 Plan in shares of Class A common stock, in replacement of certain awards denominated in shares of Class A common stock of Old Marriott outstanding on the effective date of the 1998 Spin-Off and held by individuals who were not employees of Old Marriott after the 1998 Spin-Off. These conversion awards are administered under the 2002 Incentive Plan. The awards are subject to the terms and conditions substantially similar to those governing the awards as they were in effect before the Spin-Off.1998 Spin-Off. Approximately 4,000 individuals, including ten directors, received conversion awards under the 1998 Plan, covering a total of approximately 36.7 million shares of Class A common stock.
Federal Income Tax Consequences.Consequences. The following is a brief description of the federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to stock option awards that may be granted under the
2002 Incentive Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote at the Annual Meeting and not as tax guidance to participants in the 2002 Incentive Plan.
To the extent that any option does not satisfy the requirements for an incentive stock option, it will be treated as a nonqualified stock option. An option holder generally will not recognize income for federal income tax purposes at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted and generally will recognize ordinary income upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Class A common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price. When shares acquired upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option are sold or otherwise disposed of, the option holder will recognize gain (or loss) equal to the difference between the amount realized and the option holder'sholder’s tax basis in the shares. An option holder'sholder’s tax basis in shares of Class A common stock received upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option generally is the sum of the exercise price paid and the ordinary income recognized as a result of exercising the nonqualified stock option. The Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes with respect to the exercise of a nonqualified stock option at the same time and in the same amount as ordinary income is recognized by the option holder.
An option holder will not recognize ordinary taxable income upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the option holder may be subject to the alternative minimum tax upon exercise of an award that qualifies as an incentive stock option. Upon sale of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, any gain recognized will be taxed as capital gain if such shares have been held for at least two years from the date the incentive stock option was granted and at least one year from the date the shares were transferred to the option holder. Any sale or other disposition of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option prior to the expiration of the holding period described in this paragraph is deemed a "disqualifying
disposition"“disqualifying disposition” unless the option is exercised after the option holder'sholder’s death by the option holder'sholder’s estate or by the person who acquired the right to exercise the option by reason of the option holder'sholder’s death. Upon a disqualifying disposition, an option holder will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of shares on the date the option was exercised over the exercise price or (b) the excess of the amount realized upon such disposition over the exercise price. If the amount realized exceeds the fair market value of the shares on the date of the exercise, the excess will be treated as capital gain. An option holder'sholder’s tax basis in shares of Class A common stock received upon exercise of
33
2005 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
Time and Location. The 2005 Annual Meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. at the JW Marriott Hotel. Coffee, tea, and juice will be provided to shareholders attending the meeting.
Parking. Due to anticipated needs of other hotel guests on May 6, we expect that minimal parking will be available to shareholders in the parking garage adjacent to the hotel. Several public lots are located within three blocks of the hotel.
Public Transportation. As parking is limited in the general area, we recommend that shareholders attending the annual meeting consider using public transportation. Two Metro subway stations, Federal Triangle and Metro Center, are located less than three blocks from the hotel, and the area is served by Metro buses.
Lodging. Two local Marriott hotels will offer a “Shareholder Annual Meeting” rate for Thursday, May 5, 2005, the night before the meeting. To receive these rates, call the hotel directly and ask for the shareholder annual meeting rate for May 5, 2005. Please note that a limited number of rooms are offered at this rate. Applicable taxes and gratuities are extra and advance reservations are required. This discount may not be used in conjunction with other discounts, coupons, or group rates.
JW Marriott Hotel—$199 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 202/393-2000 Near Federal Triangle Metro Station | Washington Courtyard—$125 1900 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 202/332-9300 Near Dupont Circle Metro Station |
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY N.A.
P.O. BOX 8089
EDISON, NJ 08818-8089
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
Vote-by-Internet
Log on to the Internet and go to
http://www.eproxyvote.com/mar
OR
Vote-by-Telephone
Call toll-free
1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683)
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL
Please mark
votes as in
this example.
2771
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder(s). If no instruction is indicated, such proxy will be
voted “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 and 3, “AGAINST” Proposals 4 and 5 and at the discretion of the Proxies on any other matter that may properly occur.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratificationProposals 1, 2 and 3
1. Election Of Directors:
01. J.W. Marriott, Jr.
02. Debra L. Lee
03. George Munoz
04. William J. Shaw
FOR WITHHELD
For all nominees except as noted above
2. Ratify appointment of Ernst and
Young LLP as Independent Auditors.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Approve an Increase of 5 million
Shares of the restatementCompany’s Class A
Common Stock Authorized for
Issuance under the 2002 Incentive
Plan.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Directors recommend a vote AGAINST Proposals 4 and 5
4. Shareholder Proposal to
Declassify the Board of the
Directors and Establish Annual
Election of all Directors.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
5. Shareholder Proposal to
Require Election of Directors
by a Majority of Votes Cast at
an Annual Meeting.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
MARK FOR ADDRESS
CHANGE/COMMENTS AND
MARK ON REVERSE SIDE
Signature: Date: Signature: Date:
Sign exactly as name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, give full title. If a corporation, sign full
corporate name by President, or other authorized officer. If a partnership, sign in partnership name by authorized trustee or partner.
Dear Shareholder:
Marriott International, Inc. 1998 Comprehensive Stockencourages you to take advantage of convenient ways by which you can vote your shares.
You can vote your shares electronically through the Internet or by telephone. This eliminates the need to return the proxy
card.
To vote your shares electronically, you must use the information located in the shaded box on the reverse side, above
the perforation. The series of numbers that appear in the box on the reverse side must be used to access the system.
1. To vote over the telephone: Using a touch-tone telephone, call 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683)
2. To vote over the Internet: Log onto the Internet and Cash Incentive Plan,
including an increase of 9 milliongo to the web site http://www.eproxyvote.com/mar
Your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the
proxy card.
If you choose to vote your shares electronically, there is no need for you to mail back your proxy card.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.
INTERNET ACCESS TO SHAREHOLDER ACCOUNTS
Marriott International, Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. remind you that you can access your account information via the
Internet. Visit http://equiserve.com. You will need your account number and social security number to access your account and a password
which you can receive by calling EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. at the toll-free customer service number listed below.
DEDICATED TOLL FREE CUSTOMER SERVICE NUMBER
Marriott International, Inc. shareholders should call the toll-free number indicated below for customer assistance.
1-800-311-4816
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
on May 6, 2005 at 10:30 a.m.
PROXY
The undersigned appoints J.W. Marriott, Jr. and William J. Shaw as Proxies. Each shall have the power to appoint a substitute. They are
authorized to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all shares of the Company'sMarriott International, Inc. Class A common stock authorized for issuance underheld of
record by the 1998 Plan.
ITEM 3--SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis (Editor of Highlights and Lowlights, Watergate Office
Building, 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 215, Washington, D.C. 20037), a
shareholder who owns 400 shares of Company Class A common stock, has notified
the Company of her intention to propose the following resolutionundersigned on March 15, 2005 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
"RESOLVED: That the stockholders of Marriott International, assembled
in Annual Meeting in person and by proxy, hereby request theShareholders to be held on May 6, 2005, or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. The Board of Directors to takerecommends votes FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 and AGAINST Proposals 4 and 5.
If the necessary stepsundersigned has voting rights with respect to provide for cumulative voting in
the election of directors, which means each stockholder shall be entitled
to as many votes as shall equal the number of shares he or she owns
multiplied by the number of directors to be elected, and he or she may cast
all of such votes for a single candidate, or any two or more of them as he
or she may see fit."
In support of the resolution, Mrs. Davis has submitted the following
statement:
"Many states have mandatory cumulative voting, so do National Banks. In
addition, many corporations have adopted cumulative voting. Last year the
owners of 33,321,030 shares, representing approximately 18% of shares
voting, voted FOR my proposal.
"If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution."
Board Response
The Board, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, have
considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against
it for the following reasons.
Each director of the Company currently is elected by the holders of a
majority of the voting power of the Company's shares. This permits the
directors to administer the affairs of the Company for the benefit of all
shareholders. The Board believes that cumulative voting is undesirable, because
it is directed toward the election of one or more directors by a special group
of shareholders. The subset of shareholders or special group electing a
director by cumulative voting may seek to have that director represent those
shareholders' or group's special interest, rather than the interests of the
shareholders as a whole. This partisanship among directors and special interest
voting could interfere with the effectiveness of the Board and could be
contrary to the interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole.
The majority of states, including Delaware, where the Company is
incorporated, do not require cumulative voting. The Company's present method of
electing directors is employed by over 90% of
34
companies listed in the Standard and Poor's 500 Index and by most companies
listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The Board believes that this method is
appropriate to ensure that directors will represent all the shareholders, and
not just a particular group.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
ITEMS 4 AND 5-- SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ATTRIBUTES OF
INDIVIDUALS TO BE DIRECTORS OR MEMBERS OF THE NOMINATING AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
The Company received two separate but similar shareholder proposals from
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' Pension Fund ("IBEW") and
Massachusetts Laborers' Pension Benefit Fund.
ITEM 4
IBEW (1125 15/th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005), a shareholder that
owns 8,769 shares of Company Class A common stock has notifiedunder the Company of
its intention to proposeCompany’s 401(k) savings plan or the following resolution at
Sodexho 401(k) savings plan, the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders: /
"RESOLVED, thatundersigned hereby direct(s) the shareholders of Marriott International, Inc.
("Company") request that the Company's Board of Directors set a goal of
establishing a board of directors with at least two-thirds of its members
being independent directors. The Board should pursue this goal and
transition to an independent Board through its power to nominate candidates
to stand for election by shareholders. For purposes of this resolution, a
director would not be considered independent if he or she is currently or
during the past five years has been:
. Employed by the Company or an affiliate in an executive capacity;
. Employed by a firm that is onetrustee of the Company's paid advisors or
consultants;
. Employed by a significant customer or supplier;
. Employed by a tax-exempt organization that receives significant
contributions fromapplicable 401(k) savings plan to vote shares equal to the Company;
. Paid by
number of share equivalents allocated to the Company pursuant to any personal services contractundersigned’s accounts under the applicable plans in accordance with the Company;
. Serving in an executive capacity or as a director of a corporation oninstructions given
herein. Shares for which the Company's chairman or chief executive officer is a board
member; or
. Related to a member of management of the Company."
In support of the resolution, IBEW has submitted the following statement:
"The board of directors plays a critical role in determining a company's
long-term success. A board helps meet the challenge of maximizing long-term
corporate value through those roles attributed to it by law and regulation.
A board serves as management monitor, working to assemble a well-qualified
senior management team. In conjunction with senior management, a board
contributes to the development and implementation of a corporation's
competitive strategies, while also serving as the architect of an executive
compensation plan that provides necessary incentives and rewards to
accomplish long-term corporate success. The board of directors must operate
independently of the corporation's chief executive officer and senior
management if it is to fulfill its duty to hire, oversee, compensate, and,
if necessary, replace management. Independence has been referred to as "a
director's greatest virtue" (Robert Rock,
35
Chair of National Association of Corporate Directors, "Directors and
Boards," Summer edition 1996) and we believe independent boards are better
positioned to remove non-performing senior executives.
"In order to best fulfill its responsibilities and ensure the corporation's
long-term success, we believe that at least two-thirds of a board's members
should be "independent" directors. The Company's Board of Directors as
presently composedtrustee does not meet the two-thirds independence standard. Five
of ten board members are not independent. Richard Marriott is related to a
member of management. J.W. Marriott and Mr. Shaw are employedreceive instructions by 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Wednesday, May 4, 2005, will be voted by the
Company in an executive capacity. Dr. Henry Cheng Kar-Shun and members of
his family, according to the Company's Proxy statement, "directly or
indirectly owns or leases hotel properties that are operated by
subsidiaries of the Company." Mr. Pearce serves as Vice Chairman of the
Board of General Motors, on whose Board J.W. Marriott also serves.
"As long-term shareholders, we believe an independent board best represents
shareholders. Adoption of this resolution would encourage our company to
work towards this goal. We urge you to support this resolution."
ITEM 5
Massachusetts Laborers' Pension Fund (14 New England Executive Park, Suite
200, P.O. Box 4000, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803-0900), a shareholder that
owns approximately 1,500 shares of Company Class A common stock, has notified
the Company of its intention to propose the following resolution at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders:
"RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Marriott International, Inc.
("Company") hereby request that the Company Board of Directors adopt an
Independent Board Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Policy that
provides for a transition to a Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee composed entirely of independent directors as Committee openings
occur."
Massachusetts Laborers' Pension Fund included the same definition for
determining who is considered an "independent director," as the definition of
such term included in the proposal of the IBEW set forth above.
In support of the resolution, Massachusetts Laborers' Pension Fund has
submitted the following statement:
"A Board of Director's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is
charged with the role of selecting candidates for the corporation's board.
The board of directors fulfills the vital function of hiring, monitoring,
compensating and, when necessary, replacing senior management. It
participates with and oversees management as it first develops and then
executes the corporation's strategic plans.
"The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee performs the important
task of seeking out, interviewing and ultimately recommending new board
nominees that will stand for election by the shareholders. The Board
Nominating Committee should be composed entirely of directors independent
of management who can take the necessary actions to seek, nominate, and
present new director candidates to the shareholders. The definition of
"independent" director advanced in the resolution will ensure that those
members of our Company's Nominating Committee will be
36
totally independent of management and best able to undertake their
responsibilities in developing an independent Board focused on the
Company's long-term success.
"Implementation of this resolution would strengthen the process by which
director nominees are selected at our Company. At present, our Company's
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee includes Mr. Harry Pearce.
Mr. Pearce serves on the company's Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, while at the same time, J. W. Marriott, Jr., the Company's CEO,
serves on the compensation Committee of General Motors. Mr. Pearce is Vice
Chairman of the Board of General Motors.
"As long-term shareholders, we urge your support of this important
corporate governance reform that we believe will contribute to the
Company's long-term success."
Board Response To Items 4 and 5
The Board, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, have
considered these proposals. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against
them for the following reasons.
We strongly believe in the importance of a diverse and highly qualified
board of directors. A sizable majority of the Board consists of persons who
would satisfy any reasonable test of independence, including the definition
used by the New York Stock Exchange. We note that there are only two Company
employees on the Board of Directors and neither is on the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, Mr. Pearce resigned as an
executive officer of General Motors Corporation on May 29, 2001 and is no
longer a board member of General Motors Corporation as of June 5, 2001. We have
been well served by our present policy on board and committee membership, which
selects nominees for election based on a variety of criteria, including overall
business experience and specific expertise, and gives due consideration to any
relationships with the Company. Any material relationships between the Company
and any director are disclosed under Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Adoption of these proposals would unduly restrict the candidates available
for service on the Board. The proposals also would limit consideration of
candidates who have sound judgment, extensive experience, and a thorough
knowledge of the operations of the Company. The proposals would, for example,
apply to highly qualified persons simply because they are employed by companies
that do business with us. The proposals could also inhibit us from obtaining
services from another company simply because one of its employees is a current
Company director. The Board believes that the Company's current policies
regarding the independence of directors and the independence of members of the
Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are appropriate.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Items 4 and 5.
ITEM 6--SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMITTEE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS TO
PREPARE A REPORT DESCRIBING RISKS TO SHAREHOLDERS OF OPERATING AND/OR
FRANCHISING HOTELS IN MYANMAR
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
("AFL-CIO") (815 16/th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006), a shareholder that
owns 200 shares of Company Class A /
37
common stock, has notified the Company of its intention to propose the
following resolution at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
"RESOLVED: The shareholders of Marriott International, Inc. ("Marriott" or
the "Company") urge the Board of Directors to create a committee of
independent directors to prepare a report at reasonable expense describing
the risks to shareholders of operating and/or franchising hotels in Burma,
including possible risks to Marriott's brand name resulting from
association with human rights abuses in Burma."
In support of the resolution, AFL-CIO has submitted the following statement:
"According to the American Hotel and Lodging Association, Marriott operates
and/or franchises two hotels in Burma, the Renaissance Inya Lake Yangon and
the Ramada Hotel Yangon International Airport.
"Burma has been ruled for over a decade by a military dictatorship widely
condemned for human rights abuses. The U.S. government has banned new
investment in Burma, and many U.S. companies have voluntarily withdrawn
from the country. The United Nations, the U.S. Department of Labor, the
International Labor Organization and various human rights groups have
published reports on forced labor and other human rights violations in
Burma.
"In addition, numerous reports link the use of forced labor in Burma to the
development of the tourism industry, one of the few sources of foreign
exchange for the military regime. According to a 1998 report by the U.S.
Department of Labor, 'there have been numerous allegations since 1994 that
the Government of Burma has forced many thousands of people to contribute
their labor to tourism development projects. Many hotels and other tourists
facilities which the Government of Burma has built in more remote areas
were also reportedly built with forced labor.' In February 2001, the U.S.
Department of State also noted that there are 'reports that the Government
used forced labor to construct infrastructure to support tourism.'
"One of Marriott's most valuable assets is the Marriott brand name.
According to the Company's 1999 annual report, 'The Marriott business model
is focused not on bricks and mortar, but rather on building the value of
our brands.' However, by operating in Burma, our Company may run the
significant risk that the Marriott brand name may be associated with human
rights abuses of the military regime, damaging the Company's most important
asset. Indeed, Marriott is now subject to a nationwide boycott in the
United States by the Free Burma Coalition, a coalition of student groups.
"In 2000, Best Western International, one of the world's largest hotel
brand companies, announced that it was withdrawing from Burma, removing its
brand name from a hotel in Yangon. Best Western told reporters that the
hotel would 'not operate as a Best Western Hotel until the political and
social situation in [Burma] has stabilized,' and ruled out sublicensing any
new hotels in Burma until 'civil rights' issues were solved.
"Given Marriott's small investment in Burma, we are deeply concerned that
the potential benefits of operating in Burma may be outweighed by
significant risks to the Marriott brand name. Accordingly, we believe an
assessment of the risks by a committee of independent directors is
necessary.
"We urge you to vote FOR this resolution."
38
Board Response
The Board, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, have
considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against
it for the following reasons.
We have a strong commitment to protecting human rights, both at home and
abroad. The Board has adopted a Statement of Public Policy that states,
"Marriott supports and respects the protection of human rights within the
company's sphere of influence and ensures that our business operations are not
complicit in human rights abuses." Under this Statement of Public Policy, the
Company "supports and upholds the elimination of discriminatory practices with
respect to employment and occupation; the elimination of all forms of forced
and compulsory labor; [and] the effective abolition of child labor . . . ." Our
commitment to human rights transcends local politics.
We recognize that the government of Myanmar (in what formerly was known as
Burma) has been criticized for issues related to civil rights. However, we do
not believe that terminating our minor business contacts in Myanmar is an
effective means to address this significant issue. We do not own any hotels in
Myanmar. Our only connection to this country is through a management agreement
for operation of two hotels in the capital city of Myanmar. Our involvement in
this business interest resulted from our 1997 acquisition of the Renaissance
Hotel Group N.V. Formerly, we were a party to another management agreement for
another hotel
trustee in the same city, but we have terminated that agreement. None of
these hotelsproportion as the shares for which valid instructions are locatedreceived from other participants in the remote areas where the proposal indicates that
forced labor was used to develop resorts, and no forced labor has been employed
at the hotels at least since our involvement.
We believe that the employees who work at the hotels subject to the
existing management agreement benefit from our involvement with those
properties. We are proudapplicable plan.
(change of the steps we take to train our employees and
advance their careers in the hospitality industry. While terminating the
management agreement would not necessarily result in the termination of these
employees' jobs, it would mean that they would not have continued access to the
benefits and opportunities for career advancement that we provide our employees.
In light of our favorable treatment of employees, our record of supporting
and advancing the careers of our employees everywhere, and the small size of
our business contacts in Myanmar, we do not believe that there is a risk that
we will become "associated with" human rights abuses in Myanmar. Accordingly,
we believe that the assumption underlying the proposal - that there is a risk
to the Marriott brand name from our minor contacts with Myanmar - is
ill-founded, and that endeavoring to prepare a report on any such risks is not
a useful expenditure of corporate funds or management effort.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
ITEM 7--SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALaddress/comments)
CONTINUED AND TO ADOPT, IMPLEMENT AND ENFORCE A
WORKFORCE CODE OF CONDUCT BASEDBE SIGNED ON THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR
ORGANIZATION'S CONVENTIONS ON WORKPLACE HUMAN RIGHTS
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union ("HERE") (1219
28/th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20007), a shareholder that owns 70 shares of
Company Class A common stock, has /
39
notified the Company of its intention to propose the following resolution at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
"The shareholders urge the Board of Directors to adopt, implement and
enforce a workplace code of conduct based on the International Labor
Organization's ("ILO") Conventions on workplace human rights, including the
following principles:
1. All workers shall have the right to form and join trade unions and to
bargain collectively (ILO Conventions 87 and 98).
2. Workers' representatives shall not be the subject of discrimination and
shall have access to all workplaces necessary to enable them to
carry out their representation functions (ILO Convention 135)."
In support of the resolution, HERE has submitted the following statement:
"The success of Marriott International's business depends on consumer and
governmental goodwill. According to Marriott's 2000 annual report, the
Company's growth 'is fueled by customer preference for our hotels and by
owner and franchisee demand for our brands.' Since the Marriott's [sic]
brand name is one of the Company's most significant assets, Marriott would
benefit from adopting and enforcing a code of conduct based on ILO
conventions that would ensure that the Company is not associated with human
rights violations in the workplace. Such action would protect the Company's
brand name and/or its relationships with its customers and the numerous
governments under which the Company operates and with which it may do
business.
"The risk that Marriott could be associated with workplace human rights
violations is potentially high. For example, Marriott International manages
and/or franchises hotels in Burma, China, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the
United Arab Emirates where, according to the United States Department of
State and International Confederation of Free Trade Unions, labor rights
are not adequately protected by law and/or public policy.
"In addition, Marriott's respect for labor rights has been questioned in
the United States. For example, in a report published in 2000, Human Rights
Watch cited the Company's labor dispute at the San Francisco Marriott Hotel
as a case study of 'violations of workers' freedom of association.' The San
Francisco property is currently the subject of a boycott.
"We urge you to vote FOR this resolution."
Board Response
The Board, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, have
considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against
it for the following reasons.
We are committed to providing a fair and productive workplace through a
continuing partnership with our employees. We believe that our success in these
efforts is demonstrated by our widespread recognition as a diverse and
desirable place to work. Recent accolades for our commitment to our employees
include recognition by Fortune magazine as one of the "100 Best Companies to
Work For" as well as one of the "Top 50 Companies For Minorities," receipt of
the prestigious 2002 Catalyst Award for demonstrated success in advancing
women's leadership in the workplace, recognition as one of the 50 best
companies to work for in Canada for 2002 according to the Globe and Mail's
"Report on Business" magazine, being named one of the ten best companies for
working mothers by Working Mother magazine and being on their best companies
list for the eleventh consecutive year and
40
inclusion on the list of "The 50 Best Companies for Latinas to Work for in the
US," as compiled by LatinaStyle magazine.
In light of our existing commitment to our employees, we believe that
adoption of a workplace code of conduct based on ILO Conventions would be a
step in the wrong direction. The conventions advocated by the proposal in many
cases are not designed for private employers, such as the Company, but instead
are intended for government employees. In addition, we believe that it would be
difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile a uniform code of conduct based on
the ILO Conventions with the laws of each of the 63 countries and territories
where we operate. Finally, we believe that changing our existing employee
policies would be costly and disruptive without delivering any corresponding
benefit given the success we continue to enjoy with our existing programs.
Although this proposal refers to human rights concerns, we do not view this
proposal as questioning our commitment to human rights. In fact, the Board has
adopted a Statement of Public Policy affirming that, "Marriott supports and
respects the protection of human right within the company's sphere of influence
and ensures that our business operations are not complicit in human rights
abuses." We are committed to supporting human rights and maintaining our hotels
as diverse and desirable places to work. We believe it is no coincidence that
the proposal was submitted by the parent of a local union that is involved in
collective bargaining negotiations with us. We believe this proposal, rather
than promoting shareholder value, in fact would detract from it.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
ITEM 8--SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A POLICY THAT IN THE FUTURE
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS WILL PROVIDE ONLY AUDIT SERVICES TO
THE COMPANY AND NO OTHER SERVICES
Financial Investors Trust (370 17/th Street, Suite 3100, Denver, Colorado
80202-5627), a shareholder that owns 16,746 shares of Company Class A common
stock, has notified the Company of its intention to propose the following
resolution at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders: /
"RESOLVED: That the shareholders of REVERSE SIDE
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
Marriott International, Inc. request
that the Board of Directors adopt a policy that in the future the firm that
is appointed to be the Company's independent accountants will only provide
audit services to the Company and not provide any other services."
In support of the resolution, Financial Investors Trust has submitted the
following statement:
"The Securities and Exchange Commission passed new proxy statement rules
that took effect February 5, 2001, which require companies to disclose how
much they pay their accounting firms for audit services and non-audit
services.
"According to a Wall Street Journal article of April 10, 2001: 'The
nation's biggest companies last year paid far more money than previously
estimated to their independent accounting firms for services other than
auditing, newly disclosed figures show, renewing questions about whether
41
such fees create conflicts of interest for auditing firms....At issue: How
objective can an accounting firm be in an audit when it is also making
millions of dollars providing the client with other services.'
"That Wall Street Journal article reported that of the 307 S&P 500
companies it had surveyed, the average fees for non-audit services were
nearly three times as big as the audit fees. The Company's 2001 proxy
statement disclosed that it had paid its independent auditor - Arthur
Andersen LLP - $1 million for audit work and $30.2 million directly and
indirectly for additional work [$4.8 million directly and $25.3 million
indirectly for financial systems design and implementation fees by
Accenture (formerly Andersen Consulting) before Arthur Andersen LLP
divested Accenture].
"When the SEC was seeking comments on its accountant disclosure rules,
substantial institutional investors urged that auditors should not accept
non-audit fees from companies.
"It is respectfully submitted that it would be in the best interests of the
Company's shareholders if the Board of Directors adopts a policy that in
the future any firm appointed to be the Company's independent accountants
shall only provide audit services to the Company and not provide any other
services."
Board Response
The Board, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, have
considered this proposal. The Board recommends that shareholders vote against
it for the following reasons.
We believe that it is in our shareholders' best interests to maintain the
flexibility to determine the most suitable vendor for services that we require.
In making those determinations, we are able to consider a wide range of
factors, such as cost, efficiency, expertise, familiarity with the Company, and
protection of trade secrets and other confidential information. Applying these
and other criteria, the Board in the past has determined that non-audit
services provided by the independent accountants can be high-quality, focused
and cost-efficient, especially when the independent accountants' expertise in a
particular field is coupled with its knowledge of our business operations and
our financial systems. Among the services which our independent accountants
have provided in the past, which would fall outside of the Security and
Exchange Commission's narrow definition of "audit services," are tax compliance
and consultation services, statutory audits of subsidiaries, acquisition due
diligence, transaction and accounting consultation and assistance with
registration statements.
Although we recognize that by retaining our independent accountants for
non-audit services, we must address concerns about any appearance of a conflict
of interest with the audit role of the independent accountants, we already have
established and well-recognized procedures in place to monitor and preserve
accountants' independence. For example, the Audit Committee of the Board
receives written disclosures provided for under Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 (a board formed by the SEC and the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants to address independence matters affecting public
companies' audit firms), relating to relationships that may bear on the
accountants' independence. Consistent with Standard No. 1, the Audit Committee
and the Company's accountants regularly discuss the accountants' independence
in light of those written disclosures. Taking into account these procedures,
the Audit Committee each year specifically considers whether the accountants'
provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the accountants'
independence. Furthermore, as required by the rules of the Securities and
Exchange
42
Commission, we disclose the amount of fees paid to our accountants for
non-audit services (See page 16 of this proxy statement). We also provide
shareholders an opportunity to provide their views on our selection of
independent accountants, by seeking annual shareholder ratification of our
selection. We believe these procedures facilitate Board oversight and robust
discussion on issues that might affect the accountants' independence.
Retaining the flexibility to hire our independent accountants for non-audit
services is also consistent with the position stated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in December 2000 when it amended its auditor independence
rules. After carefully considering the arguments on all sides, the SEC rejected
a total ban on non-audit services and continued to permit auditors to provide a
wide variety of non-audit services to their audit clients.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
43
OTHER MATTERS
The Company's management knows of no other matters which may be presented
for consideration at the
2002 annual meeting. However, if any other matters
properly come before the annual meeting, the persons named in the proxy intend
to vote such proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
Any shareholder who desires a copy of the Company's 2001 Annual Report on
Form 10-K may obtain one, without charge, by addressing a request to the
Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Dept. 52/862, Marriott Drive,
Washington, D.C. 20058. The Company's copying costs will be charged if copies
of exhibits to the 10-K are requested.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ DOROTHY M. INGALLS
Dorothy M. Ingalls
Secretary
44
APPENDIX A
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
I. Composition and Terms of Office
A. The Audit Committee (the "Committee") shall be appointed by the Board
of Directors and shall be composed of at least three Directors, all of
whom have no relationship to the Company that may interfere with the
exercise of their independence from management and the Company
("Independent"). In addition to the definition of Independent provided
here, additional restrictions apply to every Committee member as
outlined in the Corporate Governance Listing Standards of the New York
Comprehensive
Stock Exchange and currently filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
B. Each member of the Committee shall be financially literate as
interpreted by the Board of Directors, or must become financially
literate within a reasonable period of time after his or her
appointment to the Committee. At least one member of the Committee must
have accounting or related financial management expertise, as
interpreted by the Board of Directors.
C. The Chairman of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board of
Directors. Members of the Committee shall serve until the next Annual
Meeting of the Board of Directors or until their successors are
appointed.
II. Meetings
The Committee shall hold at least three regular meetings each year and such
additional meetings as may be deemed necessary by the Committee Chairman.
Minutes of each Committee meeting shall be submitted to the Board of
Directors, and the Chairman of the Committee will report verbally to the
full Board of Directors on matters discussed or any actions taken at the
most recent Committee meeting.
To provide access to the Committee for the internal auditors, independent
accountants and key financial management, the Committee shall request, as
deemed appropriate, attendance at its regular meetings or otherwise, of
financial management, the head of Internal Audit ("Chief Audit Executive")
and such other members of the Company's management as circumstances
require. At least annually, the Committee shall meet separately with
management, the Chief Audit Executive, and the independent accountants in
separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or
these groups believe should be discussed privately.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
A. Risk Assessment and Control Environment
The Committee shall:
1. Periodically inquire of management, the independent accountants, and
the Chief Audit Executive about significant risks or exposures and
assess the steps management has taken to minimize such risk to the
Company.
2. Consider and review with the independent accountants and Chief Audit
Executive:
. The adequacy of the Company's internal controls including
information systems controls and security.
A-1
. Related findings and recommendations of the independent
accountants and Internal Audit together with management's
responses.
3. Review audit plans with the Chief Audit Executive and independent
accountants and evaluate adequacy of proposed audit scope.
4. Review appointment and dismissal of Chief Audit Executive.
5. Periodically review progress of the annual internal audit plan and
key findings.
6. Review with appropriate management, in-house counsel and the Chief
Audit Executive, programs to ensure compliance with the Company's
Ethical Conduct Policy (CP-1) and Business Conduct Guide.
B. Financial Reporting
The Committee shall:
1. Review the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with financial
management and the independent accountants prior to release of
information to the public. The Committee may delegate this review
responsibility to its Chairman.
2. Review the Company's annual financial statements and, as
appropriate, any other reports or other financial information
submitted to any governmental body, or the public, including any
certification, report, opinion, or review rendered by the
independent accountants.
3. Following completion of the annual audit, review with the
independent accountants (and management, as appropriate) the
following:
. Their judgments of the quality and appropriateness of accounting
principles and financial disclosure practices of the Company
(including how the public's and shareholders' views of the
Company may be affected by its choice of accounting principles
and its financial disclosure practices).
. Any disagreements with management over the application of
accounting principles.
. Accounting principles applied, especially significant estimates
made by management or changes in accounting methods.
. Significant related party transactions or other significant
conflicts of interest.
. Significant audit adjustments.
. Any difficulties encountered during the audit, including any
restrictions on the scope of work or access to required
information.
. Any other matters related to the conduct of the audit to be
communicated to the Committee under Generally Accepted Auditing
Standards.
A-2
4. Meet regularly with in-house counsel to discuss legal matters that
may have a material impact on the financial statements. Meet with
outside counsel as appropriate.
5. Prepare the Audit Committee Report for annual inclusion in the
Company's proxy statement, as required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Submit the draft Report to the Board of
Directors for approval.
6. Prepare the Written Affirmation, as required by the Corporate
Governance Listing Standards of the New York Stock Exchange,
regarding the Committee members' independence and qualifications and
the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter. Submit the draft letter
to the Board of Directors for approval.
C. Relationship with Independent Accountants
The Committee shall:
1. Review the independent accountants' letter regarding independence
(required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as it may
be modified or supplemented). Discuss with the independent
accountants their independence. Consider management's plans to
engage the independent accountants to perform management advisory
services, types of services to be rendered, estimated fees and
actual fees charged.
2. Annually confirm management's recommendation of the Company's
independent accountants. Recommend appointment of independent
accountants annually to the Board of Directors for submission to
shareholders for approval. Ascertain that the independent
accountant's annual arrangement letter, with respect to the audit of
the Company's consolidated financial statements, is addressed to the
Board of Directors.
D. Other Responsibilities
1. Institute investigations of suspected improprieties on any material
matter selected by the Committee, using special counsel or outside
experts when necessary.
2. Review with the Chief Audit Executive and appropriate management the
effectiveness of controls relating to officer expenses and
perquisites.
3. At least annually, review and assess the adequacy of the Audit
Committee Charter. Submit proposed revisions to the Board of
Directors for approval. This should occur in conjunction with the
Committee's preparation of the written affirmation to the New York
Stock Exchange, as described in Section III.B.6. above.
A-3
APPENDIX B
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2002 COMPREHENSIVE STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
B-1
Contents
-i-
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2002 COMPREHENSIVE STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration
1.1 Establishment of the Plan.Plan. Marriott International, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”), hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the "Marriott“Marriott International, Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan"Plan” (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"“Plan”), as set forth in this document.
The Plan shall become effective as of the Effective Date, as defined below, and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
1.2 Purpose of the Plan.Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to promote and enhance the long-term growth of the Company by aligning the personal interests of Employees and Non-Employee Directors to those of Company shareholders and allowing such Employees and Non-Employee Directors to participate in the growth, development and financial success of the Company.
The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of key individuals.
1.3 Duration of the Plan.Plan. The Plan shall commence on the Effective Date, as described in Section 1.1 hereof, and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board of Directors to amend or terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to Article 17 hereof, until all Shares subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to the Plan'sPlan’s provisions.
Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized:
2.1 "Allocation Agreement"“Allocation Agreement” means the Employee Benefits and Other Employment Matters Allocation Agreement by and between Marriott International, Inc. (To Be Renamed Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.) and New Marriott MI, Inc. (To Be Renamed Marriott International, Inc.) dated as of September 30, 1997.
2.1.1 "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting” means the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company at which Directors are elected.
2.2 "Award"“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock Bonus Awards, Deferred Stock Agreements, Special Recognition Stock Awards, 1998 Conversion Awards, Other Share-Based Awards, Other Cash Performance-Based Awards, Non-Employee Director Share Awards, Stock Units, and Director Options.
- 1 -
2.3 "Award Agreement"“Award Agreement” means an agreement entered into by the Company and each Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan.
2.4 "Beneficial Owner"“Beneficial Owner” or "Beneficial Ownership"“Beneficial Ownership” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
B-3
2.5 "Beneficiary"“Beneficiary” means the person or persons designated pursuant to Article 14 hereof.
2.6 "Board"“Board” or "Board“Board of Directors"Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.7 "Code"“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
2.8 "Committee"“Committee” means the Compensation Policy Committee of the Board, as specified in Article 3 herein, or such other Committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan with respect to grants of Awards.
2.9 "Company"“Company” means Marriott International, Inc., together with any and all Subsidiaries, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 20 herein.
2.10 "Current Award"“Current Award” means a Deferred Stock Bonus Award granted under the terms and conditions described in Section 8.2(c) hereof.
2.11 "Covered Employee"“Covered Employee” means a Participant who, as of the date of grant, vesting and/or payout of an Award, as applicable, is one of the group of "covered“covered employees,"” as defined in the regulations promulgated under Code Section 162(m), or any successor statute.
2.12 "Deferred Award"“Deferred Award” means a Deferred Stock Bonus Award granted under the terms and conditions described in Section 8.2(b) hereof.
2.13 "Deferred Stock"“Deferred Stock” means an Award granted to a Participant as described in Article 8 herein.
2.14 "Deferred“Deferred Stock Bonus Award"Award” means a grant of a right to receive Shares on a deferred basis, pursuant to Article 8.2 hereof.
2.15 "Deferred“Deferred Stock Agreement"Agreement” means an Award granted to a Participant as described in Article 8.3 herein.
2.16 "Director"“Director” means any member of the Board.
- 2 -
2.16.1 "Director Option"“Director Option” means a Nonqualified Stock Option as described in Article 12 herein.
2.17 "Disability"“Disability” means a permanent and total disability, within the meaning of Code Section 22(e)(3), as determined by the Committee in good faith, upon receipt of sufficient competent medical advice from one or more individuals, selected by or satisfactory to the Committee, who are qualified to give professional medical advice.
2.18 "Distribution"“Distribution” means the distribution of all the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company as provided in the Distribution Agreement.
2.19 "Distribution Agreement"“Distribution Agreement” means the Distribution Agreement between Marriott International, Inc. (To Be Renamed Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.) and the Company dated as of September 30, 1997.
2.20 "Distribution Date"“Distribution Date” means the date on which the Distribution shall be effected pursuant to the Distribution Agreement.
B-4
2.21 "Effective Date"“Effective Date” has the same meaning as the term Distribution Date.
2.22 "Employee"“Employee” means any individual who is, or will become, a full-time, active, non-union employee of the Company. Any Employee who, at the request of the Company, and on the written assignment of the Company specifically referencing this provision of the Plan, becomes an employee of another employer shall continue to be treated as an Employee for all purposes hereunder during the period of such assignment. Directors who are not employed by the Company shall not be considered Employees under this Plan.
2.23 "Engaging“Engaging in Competition"Competition” means (i) engaging, individually or as an employee, consultant or owner (more than 5%) of any entity, in any business engaged in significant competition with any business operated by the Company; (ii) soliciting and hiring a key employee of the Company in another business, whether or not in significant competition with any business operated by the Company; or (iii) using or disclosing confidential Company information, in each case, without the approval of the Company.
2.24 "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.
2.25 "Fair“Fair Market Value"Value” means the average of the highest and lowest quoted selling prices for the Shares on the relevant date, or (if there were no sales on such date) the average so computed on the nearest day before or the nearest day after the relevant date, as reported inThe Wall Street Journal or a similar publication selected by the Committee.
2.26 "Fee“Fee Deferral Election"Election” means an election made by a Non-Employee Director to defer the receipt of Fees, as described in Section 12.3 hereof.
- 3 -
2.27 "Fees"“Fees” means all or part of any retainer and/or fees payable to a Non-Employee Director in his or her capacity as such.
2.28 "Incentive“Incentive Stock Option"Option” or "ISO"“ISO” means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 herein, which is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and which is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.
2.29 "Insider"“Insider” shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, Director or more than ten percent (10%) beneficial owner of any class of the Company'sCompany’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
2.30 "1998“1998 Conversion Award"Award” means an Award made pursuant to Article 13 to reflect the effect of the Distribution on outstanding awards which were made under the Predecessor Plans and which were held by the grantee immediately before the Distribution.
2.31 "Non-Employee Director"“Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee of the Company.
2.32 "Non-Employee“Non-Employee Director Share Award"Award” shall mean an award of Shares to a Non-Employee Director, as described in Section 12.2 herein.
2.33 "Nonqualified“Nonqualified Stock Option"Option” or "NQSO"“NQSO” means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 herein and which is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.
2.34 "Option"“Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option, as described in Article 6 herein, or a Director Option as described in Article 12 herein.
B-5
2.35 "Option Price"“Option Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.
2.36 "Other“Other Cash Performance-Based Awards"Awards” means an Other Cash Performance-Based Award, as described in Article 10 herein.
2.37 "Other“Other Share-Based Award"Award” means an Other Share-Based Award, as described in Article 10 herein.
2.38 "Participant"“Participant” means an individual who has an outstanding Award granted under the Plan.
2.39 "Performance-Based Exception"“Performance-Based Exception” means the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m).
2.40 "Period“Period of Restriction"Restriction” means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock is limited in some way (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance objectives, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion), and the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, as provided in Article 7 herein.
- 4 -
2.41 "Person"“Person” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a "group"“group” as defined in Section 13(d) thereof.
2.42 "Predecessor Plans"“Predecessor Plans” means the Marriott International, Inc. 1993 Comprehensive Stock Incentive Plan, the Marriott International, Inc. 1996 Comprehensive Stock Incentive Plan and the Marriott International, Inc. 1995 Non-Employee Directors'Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.
2.43 "Restricted Stock"“Restricted Stock” means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 7 herein.
2.44 "Shares"“Shares” means shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company or of any successor company adopting this Plan.
2.45 "Special“Special Recognition Stock Award"Award” means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 9 herein.
2.46 "Stock Units"“Stock Units” means the credits to a Non-Employee Director'sDirector’s Stock Unit Account, each of which represents the right to receive one Share upon settlement of the Stock Unit Account.
2.47 "Stock“Stock Unit Account"Account” means the bookkeeping account established by the Company pursuant to Section 12.3.
2.48 "Subsidiary"“Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity in which the Company owns a majority of the equity interest by vote or by value or in which the Company has a majority capital or profits interest.
2.49 "Termination“Termination of Service"Service” means termination of service as a Non-Employee Director in any of the following circumstances:
(a) Where the Non-Employee Director voluntarily resigns or retires;
B-6
(b) Where the Non-Employee Director is not re-elected (or elected in the case of an appointed Non-Employee Director) to the Board by the shareholders; or
(c) Where the Non-Employee Director dies.
2.50 "Year“Year of Service"Service” means a period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months during which an Employee was paid for 1200 or more hours of work for the Company.
- 5 -
3.1 The Committee.Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Policy Committee of the Board, or by any other committee appointed by the Board, the members of which shall be "Non-Employee Directors"“Non-Employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, or any successor provision. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.
3.2 Authority of the Committee.Committee. Except as limited by law or by the CertificateArticles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company, and subject to the provisions herein, the Committee shall have full power to select Employees and Directors who shall participate in the Plan; determine the sizes and types of Awards; determine the terms and conditions of Awards in a manner consistent with the Plan; construe and interpret the Plan and any agreement or instrument entered into under the Plan; establish, amend, or waive rules and regulations for the Plan'sPlan’s administration; and (subject to the provisions of Article 17 herein) amend the terms and conditions of any outstanding Award to the extent such terms and conditions are within the discretion of the Committee as provided in the Plan. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Committee'sCommittee’s determinations under the Plan (including without limitation, determinations of the persons to receive Awards, the form, amount and timing of such Awards, the terms and provisions of such Awards and the Award Agreements evidencing such Awards) need not be uniform and may be made by the Committee selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive, Awards under the Plan, whether or not such persons are similarly situated. As permitted by law, the Committee may delegate its authority under the Plan to a Director or Employee.
3.3 Decisions Binding.Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee or its designee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Board shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties.
3.4 Unanimous Consent in Lieu of Meeting.Meeting. A memorandum signed by all members of the Committee shall constitute the act of the Committee without the necessity in such event to hold a meeting.
Article 4. Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1 Number of Shares.Shares. Subject to Sections 4.2 and 4.3 herein, (a) no more than 80 million shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan, and (b) the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be subject to any Awards (other than 1998 Conversion Awards) granted in any one fiscal year to any single Employee shall be 750,000.
- 6 -
4.2 Lapsed Awards.Awards. If any Award granted under the Plan is canceled, terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason, any Shares subject to such Award shall again be available for the grant of an Award under the Plan.
B-7
4.3 Adjustments in Authorized Shares and Awards.Awards. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, such as a stock split, or a corporate transaction, such as any merger, consolidation, separation, including a spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code Section 368) or any partial or complete liquidation of the Company, (a) such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Shares which may be delivered under Section 4.1 and the Award limits set forth in Section 4.1 as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; and (b) the Committee or the board of directors, compensation committee or similar body of any other legal entity assuming the obligations of the Company hereunder, shall either (i) make appropriate provision for the protection of outstanding Awards by the substitution on an equitable basis of appropriate equity interests or awards similar to the Awards, provided that the substitution neither enlarges nor diminishes the value and rights under the Awards; or (ii) upon written notice to the Participants, provide that Awards will be exercised, distributed, canceled or exchanged for value pursuant to such terms and conditions (including the waiver of any existing terms or conditions) as shall be specified in the notice. Any adjustment of an ISO under this paragraph shall be made in such a manner so as not to constitute a "modification"“modification” within the meaning of Section 424(h)(3) of the Code.
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
5.1 Eligibility.Eligibility. Employees shall be eligible to participate in this Plan with respect to Awards specified in Articles 6 through 10. Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to Awards specified in Article 12. Persons eligible to receive 1998 Conversion Awards under the Allocation Agreement shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to Awards specified in Article 13.
5.2 Actual Participation by Employees.Employees. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all eligible Employees, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award.
6.1 Grant of Options.Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Options may be granted to Employees in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. Options may include provisions for reload of Options exercised by the tender of Shares or the withholding of Shares with respect to the exercise of the Options. An Option, once granted, may not thereafter be amended to change the Option Price.
- 7 -
6.2 Award Agreement.Agreement. Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO within the meaning of Code Section 422, or an NQSO whose grant is intended not to fall under the provisions of Code Section 422.
6.3 Option Price.Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Article 6 shall be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted.
B-8
6.4 Duration of Options.Options. Each Option granted under this Article 6 shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided, however, that no Option shall be exercisable later than the fifteenth (15th) anniversary date of its grant.
6.5 Exercise of Options.Options. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Employee.
The ability of an Employee to exercise an Option is conditioned upon the Employee not committing any criminal offense or malicious tort relating to or against the Company.
6.6 Payment.Payment. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of notice of exercise to the Company by such means as the Committee shall approve from time to time, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares.
The Option Price upon exercise of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent, or (b) if permitted in the governing Award Agreement, by tendering previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price (provided that the Shares which are tendered must have been held by the Participant for at least six (6) months prior to their tender to satisfy the Option Price), or (c) if permitted in the governing Award Agreement, by a combination of (a) and (b).
The Committee also may allow cashless exercise as permitted under the Federal Reserve Board'sBoard’s Regulation T, subject to applicable securities law restrictions, or by any other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plan'sPlan’s purpose and applicable law.
6.8 Restrictions on Share Transferability.Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable Federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
- 8 -
6.9 Termination of Employment or Leave of Absence.Absence. In the event that an Employee, during the Employee'sEmployee’s lifetime has been on leave of absence for a period of greater than twelve (12) months (except a leave of absence approved by the Board or the Committee, as the case may be), or ceases to be an Employee of the Company or of any Subsidiary for any reason, including retirement, the portion of any Option which is not exercisable on the date on which the Employee ceased to be an Employee or has been on leave for over twelve (12) months (except a leave of absence approved by the Board or the Committee, as the case may be) shall expire on such date and any unexercised portion thereof which was otherwise exercisable on such date shall expire unless exercised within a period of three (3) months (one year in the case of a Participant terminating by reason of a Disability) from such date, but in no event after the expiration of the term for which the Option was granted; provided, however, that in the case of an optionee of a NQSO who is an "Approved Retiree"“Approved Retiree” (as hereinafter defined), the Option shall continue to vest for up to five years from the date of retirement and said optionee may exercise such NQSO until the sooner to occur of (i) the expiration of such NQSO in B-9
(a) An "Approved Retiree"“Approved Retiree” is any optionee who (i) terminates employment by reason of a Disability, or (ii) (A) retires from employment with the Company with the specific approval of the Committee on or after such date on which the optionee has completed 20 Years of Service or has attained age 55 and completed 10 Years of Service, and (B) has entered into and has not breached an agreement to refrain from Engaging in Competition in form and substance satisfactory to the Committee; and
(b) If an Approved Retiree is subsequently found by the Committee to have violated the provisions of the agreement to refrain from Engaging in Competition referred to in clause (a)(ii)(B) of this section, such Approved Retiree shall have ninety (90) days from the date of such finding within which to exercise any Options or portions thereof which are exercisable on such date, any Options or portions thereof which are not exercised within such ninety- (90-) day period shall expire and any Options or portion thereof which are not exercisable on such date shall be canceled on such date.
In the event of the death of an optionee during the three-month period described above for exercise of an Option by a terminated optionee or one on leave for over 12 months (except a leave of absence approved by the Board or the Committee, as the case may be), the Option shall be exercisable by the optionee'soptionee’s personal representatives, heirs or legatees to the same extent and during the same period that the optionee could have exercised the Option if the optionee had not died.
Notwithstanding anything in Section 6.5 to the contrary, in the event of the death of an optionee while an Employee or Approved Retiree of the Company or any Subsidiary, an outstanding Option held by such optionee upon death shall become fully vested upon death and shall be exercisable by the optionee'soptionee’s personal representatives, heirs or legatees at any time prior to the expiration of one (1) year from the date of death of the optionee, but in no event after the expiration of the term for which the Option was granted.
- 9 -
6.10 Nontransferability of Options.
(a)Incentive Stock Options.Options. No ISO granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, all ISOs granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.
(b)Nonqualified Stock Options.Options. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant'sParticipant’s Award Agreement or pursuant to policies adopted by the Committee, no NQSO granted under this Article 6 may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except as otherwise provided in the Plan or a Participant'sParticipant’s Award Agreement, all NQSOs granted to a Participant under this Article 6 shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.
7.1 Grant of Restricted Stock.Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Employees in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.
B-10
7.2 Restricted Stock Agreement.Agreement. Each Restricted Stock grant shall be evidenced by a Restricted Stock Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.
7.3 Transferability.Transferability. Except as provided in this Article 7, the Shares of Restricted Stock granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction established by the Committee and specified in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement. All rights with respect to the Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant.
7.4 Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance objectives (Company-wide, business unit, and/or individual), time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance objectives, and/or restrictions under applicable Federal or state securities laws.
The Company shall retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company'sCompany’s possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied.
- 10 -
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan shall become freely transferable by the Participant after the last day of the applicable Period of Restriction.
Distribution of Shares of Restricted Stock is conditioned upon the Participant not committing any criminal offense or malicious tort relating to or against the Company.
7.5 Voting Rights.Rights. During the Period of Restriction, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares.
7.6 Dividends and Other Distributions.Distributions. During the Period of Restriction, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may be credited with regular cash dividends paid with respect to the underlying Shares while they are so held. Such dividends may be paid currently, accrued as contingent cash obligations, or converted into additional shares of Restricted Stock, upon such terms as the Committee establishes.
The Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that the Committee deems appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, if the grant or vesting of Restricted Stock granted to a Covered Employee is designed to comply with the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may apply any restrictions it deems appropriate to the payment of dividends declared with respect to such Restricted Stock, such that the dividends and/or the Restricted Stock maintain eligibility for the Performance-Based Exception.
7.7 Termination of Employment. In the event a Participant'sParticipant’s employment with the Company is terminated because of the Participant'sParticipant’s Disability or death during the Period of Restriction, the Period of Restriction shall end and the Participant'sParticipant’s rights thereunder shall inure to the benefit of his or her Beneficiary.
B-11
In the event that a Participant'sParticipant’s employment with the Company is terminated during the Period of Restriction because of either the Participant's:Participant’s: (a) retirement with specific approval from the Committee following attainment of age 55 and with ten (10) Years of Service or (b) retirement with specific approval from the Committee and with twenty (20) Years of Service, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the percentage, if any, of a Participant'sParticipant’s outstanding Restricted Shares as to which the Period of Restriction shall end. In the event that a Participant'sParticipant’s employment with the Company is terminated for any other reason during the Period of Restriction, such Participant'sParticipant’s outstanding Restricted Shares shall be forfeited to the Company without payment.
8.1 Award of Deferred Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Deferred Stock Bonus Awards or Deferred Stock Agreements may be granted to Employees at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the amount of Deferred Stock granted to each Employee (subject to Article 4 herein) and, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such Awards of Deferred Stock.
- 11 -
8.2 Deferred Stock Bonus Awards. Deferred Stock Bonus Awards may be granted as part of a management incentive program under which part of the annual performance bonus awarded to managers and other key Employees is made in Deferred Stock. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Deferred Stock Bonus Awards shall have such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee. As determined by the Committee and subject to the terms of the Plan, Participants selected by the Committee in its discretion may elect to receive their Deferred Stock Bonus Award in the form of either a Current Award or a Deferred Award.
(a)Method of Election. Each Participant who is granted a Deferred Stock Bonus Award and selected by the Committee in its discretion may elect, in writing, on a form to be furnished by the Company, to receive a Current Award or a Deferred Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any eligible Participant who does not elect to receive a Deferred Award within the time designated by the Company shall be granted a Current Award.
(b)Deferred Award.
(i) Vesting.Vesting. Deferred Stock granted in connection with a Deferred Award shall contingently vest, pro rata, in annual installments commencing one year after the date of the Deferred Stock Bonus Award and continuing on each January 2 thereafter until the expiration of a ten-year period from such commencement date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested Deferred Stock subject to a Deferred Award shall vest upon the Participant's:Participant’s: (1) termination of employment following attainment of age 55 with ten (10) Years of Service; (2) termination of employment with retirement approval from the Committee and with twenty (20) Years of Service; (3) Disability, or (4) death. Subject to Section 4.3 herein, unvested Deferred Stock shall not vest following termination of employment for any other reason.
(ii)Distribution of Shares.Shares. Vested Shares will be distributed to the Participant in two (2) to ten (10) approximately equal annual installments, as elected by the Participant, or over such shorter period as determined by the Committee. Such distribution shall commence in the month of January following the date the Participant terminates employment; provided, however, that the Participant may elect, at the time of grant and prior to vesting in any shares of Deferred Stock subject to an Award, to receive his or her vested Shares in a single distribution which shall take place in the month of January following the year during which his or her termination of employment occurs.
B-12
All such elections made pursuant to this Section 8.2(b)(ii), shall be made at the time the Deferred Stock Bonus Award is granted, and shall be made, in writing, on a form prescribed by the Committee. Upon a Participant'sParticipant’s death, all undistributed vested Deferred Stock will be distributed in one distribution as provided in Article 10 herein.
- 12 -
(c)Current Award.
(i)Distribution of Shares.Shares. Shares subject to a Current Award will be distributed in ten (10) consecutive, approximately equal, annual installments, commencing in the first calendar quarter of the year following the year in which the Deferred Stock Bonus Award is granted. If a Participant dies prior to distribution of all Shares to which he or she is entitled, the remaining Shares will be distributed in one distribution as provided in Article 10 herein.
(ii)Forfeiture of Shares.Shares. Any undistributed Shares subject to a Current Award will be forfeited and the Deferred Stock Bonus Award relating thereto terminated, without payment, if the Participant'sParticipant’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason other than the Participant's:Participant’s: (1) termination of employment at or beyond age 55 with 10 Years of Service, (2) retirement after 20 Years of Service with approval from the Committee, (3) Disability, or (4) death. Any undistributed Shares not subject to forfeiture shall continue to be distributed to the Participant under the distribution schedule which would have applied to those Shares if the Participant had not terminated employment, or over such shorter period as may be determined by the Committee.
(d)Conditions.Distribution of Shares under Current Awards and Deferred Awards is conditioned upon:
(i) the Participant not committing any criminal offense or malicious tort relating to or against the Company;
(ii) the Participant not Engaging in Competition; and
(iii) the Participant having provided the Committee with a current address where the Deferred Stock Bonus Award may be distributed.
If said conditions are not met, all undistributed Shares will be forfeited and the Deferred Stock Bonus Award terminated, without payment.
(e)Lump Sum Payments.Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, any Participant entitled upon termination of employment to receive a distribution pursuant to this Article 8 which has a total Fair Market Value at the time of such termination of $5,000 or less shall receive such distribution in one lump sum as soon as practicable following termination of employment.
- 13 -
8.3 Deferred Stock Agreements. Deferred Stock Agreements represent Deferred Stock granted to a Participant subject to the following conditions:
(a)Vesting. Deferred Stock granted pursuant to this Section 8.3 shall contingently vest over a specified number of years, as determined by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the vested percentage, if any, of all unvested Deferred Stock subject to a Deferred Stock Agreement upon either the Participant'sParticipant’s (1) termination of employment with retirement approval from the Committee following attainment of age 55 and with ten (10) Years of Service or (2) termination of
B-13
Participant'sParticipant’s termination of employment as a result of the Participant'sParticipant’s Disability or death. Subject to Section 4.3 herein, unless otherwise provided in the Deferred Stock Agreement, if the Participant'sParticipant’s employment with the Company is terminated for any other reason, all Deferred Stock that is not vested before such termination of employment shall be forfeited and the Deferred Stock Agreement terminated without payment.
(b)Distribution of Shares. Vested Deferred Stock granted pursuant to this Section 8.3 shall be distributed to the Participant in the form of Shares in the manner specified in the Deferred Stock Agreement, or over such shorter period as the Committee may direct. Such distribution shall commence in accordance with the terms of the Deferred Stock Agreement; provided that upon the Participant'sParticipant’s death or as soon as practicable thereafter, all unpaid vested Deferred Stock shall be distributed in the form of Shares, in one distribution, as provided in Article 14 hereof.
(c)Conditions.Distribution of Shares subject to Deferred Stock Agreements is conditioned upon:
(i) the Participant not Engaging in Competition,
(ii) the Participant not committing any criminal offense or malicious tort relating to or against the Company; and
(iii) the Participant having provided the Committee with a current address where the Deferred Stock may be distributed.
If said conditions are not met, all undistributed Deferred Stock will be forfeited and the Deferred Stock Agreement terminated without payment.
8.4 Assignment. A Participant'sParticipant’s rights under a Deferred Stock Agreement or Deferred Stock Bonus Award may not, without the Company'sCompany’s written consent, be assigned or otherwise transferred, nor shall they be subject to any right or claim of a Participant'sParticipant’s creditors, provided that the Company may offset any amounts owing to or guaranteed by the Company, or owing to any credit union related to the Company against the value of Deferred Stock and underlying Shares to be distributed under Deferred Stock Agreements and Deferred Stock Bonus Awards.
- 14 -
Article 9. Special Recognition Stock Awards
Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee or its designee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Special Recognition Stock Awards to Employees in such amounts and upon such conditions as the Committee or its designee shall determine.
10.1 Grant of Other Share-Based Awards. The Committee may grant Other Share-Based Awards to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee.
10.2 Terms of Other Share-Based Awards.Other Share-Based Awards shall contain such terms and conditions as the Committee may from time to time specify and may be denominated in cash, in Shares, in Share-equivalent units, in Share appreciation units, in securities or debentures convertible into Shares or in a combination of the foregoing and may be paid in cash or in Shares, all as determined by the Committee. Other Share-Based Awards may be issued alone or in tandem with other Awards granted to Employees.
B-14
10.3 Other Share-Based Award Agreement. Each Other Share-Based Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine.
10.4 Other Cash Performance-Based Awards. The Committee may grant Other Cash Performance-Based Awards based on performance measures set forth in Article 11 not based on Shares upon such terms and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. Each such Other Cash Performance-Based Award shall be evidenced by an award agreement that shall specify such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. An Other Cash Performance-Based Award not based upon Shares shall not decrease the number of Shares under Article 4 that may be issued pursuant to other Awards. No individual shall be eligible to receive a payment with respect to cash performance-based awards in excess of $4 million in any calendar year. Other Cash Performance-Based Awards may relate to annual bonus or long-term performance awards.
Article 11. Performance Measures for Awards
11.1 Performance Measures. Unless and until the Committee proposes for shareholder vote and shareholders approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 11, the attainment of which may determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to Awards granted to Covered Employees which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of such Awards shall be chosen from among the following alternatives:
(a) Consolidated cash flows,
- 15 -
(b) Consolidated financial reported earnings,
(c) Consolidated economic earnings,
(d) Earnings per share,
(e) Business unit financial reported earnings,
(f) Business unit economic earnings,
(g) Business unit cash flows,
(h) Appreciation in the Fair Market Value of Shares either alone or as measured against the performance of the stocks of a group of companies approved by the Committee,
(i) Return on invested capital,
(j) Consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"(“EBITDA”), and
(k) Business unit EBITDA.
11.2 Adjustments. The Committee shall have the discretion to adjust the determinations of the degree of attainment of the preestablished performance objectives; provided, however, that Awards that are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception and that are held by Covered Employees may not be adjusted upward (the Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward).
B-15
11.3 Committee Discretion.In the event that applicable tax and/or securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing performance measures without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that do not qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m).
Article 12. Directors'Directors’ Share Awards, Fee Deferral Elections, and Director Options
12.1 Eligibility. Only Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to receive Non-Employee Director Share Awards and Director Options and to make Fee Deferral Elections.
12.2 Non-Employee Director Share Awards. On the first full trading day immediately following each Annual Meeting, each Non-Employee Director designated by the Board shall receive a Non-Employee Director Share Award of a number of Shares determined by the Board before such Annual Meeting. Each Non-Employee Director Share Award shall be fully vested and nonforfeitable when granted.
- 16 -
12.3 Fee Deferral Elections.
(a)Elections to Defer Payment of Fees.Fees. Payment of all or any part of any Fees payable to a Non-Employee Director may be deferred by election of the Non-Employee Director. Each such election must be made in writing on a form prescribed by the Committee and delivered to the Company prior to the next Annual Meeting and must be irrevocable until the following Annual Meeting. No election may be made under this Section 12.3(a) with respect to Fees for which an election is made under Section 12.5.
(b)Crediting Stock Units to Accounts.Accounts. Amounts deferred pursuant to a Fee Deferral Election shall be credited as of the date of the deferral to a Stock Unit Account in Stock Units. The number of Stock Units credited to a Stock Unit Account with respect to any Non-Employee Director shall equal (i) the amount deferred pursuant to the Fee Deferral Election divided by (ii) the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date on which the Fees subject to the Fee Deferral Election would have been paid but for the Fee Deferral Election, with fractional units calculated to at least three (3) decimal places.
(c)Fully Vested Stock Units.Units. All Stock Units credited to a Non-Employee Director'sDirector’s Stock Unit Account pursuant to this Section 12.3 shall be at all times fully vested and nonforfeitable.
(d)Credit of Dividend Equivalents. As of each dividend payment date with respect to Shares, each Non-Employee Director shall have credited to his or her Stock Unit Account an additional number of Stock Units equal to the product of (i) the per-share cash dividend payable with respect to a Share on such dividend payment date multiplied by the number of Stock Units credited to his or her Stock Unit Account as of the close of business on the record date for such dividend, divided by (ii) the Fair Market Value of a Share on such dividend payment date. If dividends are paid on Shares in a form other than cash, then such dividends shall be notionally converted to cash, if their value is readily determinable, and credited in a manner consistent with the foregoing and, if their value is not readily determinable, shall be credited "in kind"“in kind” to the Non-Employee Director'sDirector’s Stock Unit Account.
(e)Payment of Stock Units.Units. Upon Termination of Service, the Stock Units credited to a Non-Employee Director'sDirector’s Stock Unit Account shall be paid to the Non-Employee Director in an equal number of shares of Stock in a single lump sum or in substantially equal annual B-16
(f)Delivery of Stock Certificates.Certificates. The Company shall issue and deliver to the Non-Employee Director a stock certificate for Shares in payment of Stock Units as soon as practicable following the date on which Stock Units are payable, provided, however, that no stock certificate shall be delivered with respect to the payment of any Stock Unit prior to the expiration of six (6) months from the date such Stock Unit was credited to the Non-Employee Director'sDirector’s Stock Unit Agreement.
- 17 -
12.4 Unfunded Status.The interest of each Non-Employee Director in any Fees deferred under this Article 12 (and any Stock Units or Stock Unit Account relating thereto) or in any Director Stock Award shall be that of a general creditor of the Company. Stock Unit Accounts and Stock Units (and, if any, "in
kind"“in kind” dividends) credited thereto shall at all times be maintained by the Company as bookkeeping entries evidencing unfunded and unsecured general obligations of the Company.
12.5 Director Options.
(a)Elections to Receive Payment of Fees in the Form of Options.A Non-Employee Director may elect to receive payment of all or any part of his or her cash retainer in the form of Director Options in lieu of cash. Each such election must be made in writing on a form prescribed by the Committee and delivered to the Company prior to each Annual Meeting that marks the commencement of the annual period of service during which such Fees are earned. Each election is irrevocable for that annual period. Elections under this Section 12.5 may not be made with respect to Fees deferred under Section 12.3.
(b)Grant of Director Options.On the first full trading day immediately following each Annual Meeting, each Non-Employee Director who has filed an election under Section 12.5(a) for the annual period of service that commences with such Annual Meeting shall be granted Director Options that have a value on the date of grant substantially equal to the amount of Fees otherwise payable to the Director in cash but for the election to receive Director Options. The value of Director Options shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, at a meeting held prior to the Annual Meeting, based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model or other valuation model that the Committee determines to be appropriate in its sole discretion.
(c)Terms of Director Options. Each Director Option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, and the number of Shares to which the Option pertains. Each Director Option shall (i) have an Option Price equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted; (ii) become 100% vested and first exercisable on the last business day immediately preceding the Annual Meeting next following the date the Option is granted or, if earlier, upon the Director'sDirector’s Termination of Service due to death or Disability; (iii) expire on the tenth (10/th)(10th) anniversary of the date of its grant; and (iv) be nontransferable unless otherwise specified by the Committee. /
(d)Payment. Director Options granted under this Article 12 shall be exercised by the delivery of notice of exercise to the Company in such manner as the Committee shall determine, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares. The Option Price upon exercise of any Director Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (i) in cash or its equivalent, (ii) by B-17
- 18 -
the Shares which are tendered must have been held by the Director for at least six (6) months prior to their tender to satisfy the Option Price), or (iii) by a combination of (i) and (ii). The Committee also may allow cashless exercise as permitted under the Federal Reserve Board'sBoard’s Regulation T, subject to applicable securities law restrictions, or by any other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plan'sPlan’s purpose and applicable law.
Article 13. 1998 Conversion Awards
All 1998 Conversion Awards which, under the Allocation Agreement, are to be denominated in equal numbers of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company, shall be issued under the Plan as provided in the Allocation Agreement. The Committee shall administer all such 1998 Conversion Awards under this Plan, giving service credit to the grantee of each such 1998 Conversion Award to the extent required under the Allocation Agreement. All 1998 Conversion Awards shall be subject to substantially similar terms and conditions as provided in the holder'sholder’s corresponding awards under the Predecessor Plan.
Article 14. Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under the Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of the Participant'sParticipant’s death before the Participant has received any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Company, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant'sParticipant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant'sParticipant’s death shall be paid to the Participant'sParticipant’s estate.
The Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer such Participant'sParticipant’s receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant by virtue of the exercise of an Option, or the payment of or the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to any other Award. If any such deferral election is required or permitted, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment deferrals.
Article 16. Rights of Participants
16.1Employment or Service.Service. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant'sParticipant’s employment or service at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company.
- 19 -
16.2 Participation.Participation. No Employee shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.
Article 17. Amendment, Modification, and Termination
17.1 Amendment, Modification, and Termination.Termination. The Board may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan in whole or in part; provided, however, that the Board may, in its sole discretion, condition the adoption of any amendment of the Plan on the approval thereof by the requisite vote of the shareholders of the Company entitled to vote thereon.
B-18
17.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. Subject to the restriction set forth in Article 11 herein on the exercise of upward discretion with respect to Awards which have been designed to comply with the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.3 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan.
17.3 Awards Previously Granted.Granted. No termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan or any Award shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan, without the written consent of the Participant holding such Award.
17.4 Compliance with Code Section 162(m). At all times when Code Section 162(m) is applicable, all Awards granted under this Plan shall comply with the requirements of Code Section 162(m); provided, however, that in the event the Committee determines that such compliance is not desired with respect to any Award or Awards available for grant under the Plan, then compliance with Code Section 162(m) will not be required. In addition, in the event that changes are made to Code Section 162(m) to permit greater flexibility with respect to any Award or Awards available under the Plan, the Committee may, subject to this Article 17, make any adjustments it deems appropriate.
17.5 Substitution of Awards in Mergers and Acquisitions. Awards may be granted under the Plan from time to time in substitution for awards held by employees or directors of entities who become or are about to become employees or directors of the Company or a Subsidiary as the result of a merger, consolidation or other acquisition of the employing entity or the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of the assets or stock of the employing entity. The terms and conditions of any substitute awards so granted may vary from the terms and conditions set forth herein to the extent that the Committee deems appropriate at the time of grant to conform the substitute awards to the provisions of the awards for which they are substituted.
- 20 -
18.1 Tax Withholding.Withholding. The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct from any amount otherwise due to the Participant, or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan.
18.2 Share Withholding.Withholding. With respect to withholding required in connection with any Award, the Company may require, or the Committee may permit a Participant to elect, that the withholding requirement be satisfied, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be withheld on the transaction. Any election by a Participant shall be irrevocable, made in writing, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be B-19
Company'sCompany’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.
All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company, or a merger, consolidation or otherwise.
- 21 -
Article 21. Legal Construction
21.1 Gender and Number.Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.
21.2 Severability.Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
21.3 Requirements of Law.Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
21.4 Securities Law Compliance.Compliance. With respect to Insiders, transactions under this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. To the extent any provision of the plan or action by the Committee fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Committee.
21.5 Governing Law.Law. To the extent not preempted by Federal law, the Plan, and all agreements hereunder, shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.
B-20
2002 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
Time and Location. The 2002 Annual Meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. at the
J.W. Marriott Hotel. Coffee, tea, and juice will be provided to shareholders
attending the meeting.
Parking. Due to anticipated needs of other hotel guests on May 3, minimal
parking is expected to be available to shareholders in the parking garage
adjacent to the hotel. Several public lots are located within three blocks of
the hotel.
Public Transportation. As parking is limited in the general area, it is
recommended that shareholders attending the annual meeting consider using
public transportation. Two Metro subway stations, Federal Triangle and Metro
Center, are located less than three blocks from the hotel, and the area is
served by Metro buses.
Lodging. A "Shareholder Annual Meeting" rate will be offered at two local
Marriott hotels for Thursday, May 2, 2002, the night before the meeting. To
receive these rates, call the hotel directly and ask for the shareholder annual
meeting rate for May 2, 2002. Please note that a limited number of rooms are
offered at this rate. Applicable taxes and gratuities are extra and advance
reservations are required. This discount may not be used in conjunction with
other discounts, coupons, or group rates.
J.W. Marriott Hotel--$175 Washington Courtyard--$125
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, 1900 Connecticut Avenue,
N.W. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004 Washington, D.C. 20009
202/393-2000 202/332-9300
Near Federal Triangle Near Dupont Circle Metro
Metro Station Station
[MAP]